Literature DB >> 14620347

A relevance theory of induction.

Douglas L Medin1, John D Coley, Gert Storms, Brett K Hayes.   

Abstract

A framework theory, organized around the principle of relevance, is proposed for category-based reasoning. According to the relevance principle, people assume that premises are informative with respect to conclusions. This idea leads to the prediction that people will use causal scenarios and property reinforcement strategies in inductive reasoning. These predictions are contrasted with both existing models and normative logic. Judgments of argument strength were gathered in three different countries, and the results showed the importance of both causal scenarios and property reinforcement in category-based inferences. The relation between the relevance framework and existing models of category-based inductive reasoning is discussed in the light of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620347     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

Review 1.  Properties of inductive reasoning.

Authors:  E Heit
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Expertise and category-based induction.

Authors:  J B Proffitt; J D Coley; D L Medin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A bird's eye view: biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures.

Authors:  Jeremy N Bailenson; Michael S Shum; Scott Atran; Douglas L Medin; John D Coley
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-05

4.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A hypothesis-assessment model of categorical argument strength.

Authors:  J McDonald; M Samuels; J Rispoli
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-05

6.  Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning.

Authors:  I Choi; R E Nisbett; E E Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-12

7.  Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability.

Authors:  E E Smith; E Shafir; D Osherson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993 Oct-Nov

8.  When explanations compete: the role of explanatory coherence on judgements of likelihood.

Authors:  S A Sloman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-07

9.  Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning.

Authors:  E Heit; J Rubinstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Categorical inference is not a tree: the myth of inheritance hierarchies.

Authors:  S A Sloman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Broadening the study of inductive reasoning: confirmation judgments with uncertain evidence.

Authors:  Tommaso Mastropasqua; Vincenzo Crupi; Katya Tentori
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoning.

Authors:  Felix G Rebitschek; Josef F Krems; Georg Jahn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength.

Authors:  Evan Heit; Aidan Feeney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

4.  When similarity and causality compete in category-based property generalization.

Authors:  Bob Rehder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

5.  Test sample selection by preschool children: honoring diversity.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Shipley; Barbara Shepperson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

6.  How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability.

Authors:  Aidan Feeney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

7.  How goals affect the organization and use of domain knowledge.

Authors:  Benjamin D Jee; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

8.  Tracking mouse movement in feature inference: category labels are different from feature labels.

Authors:  Takashm Yamauchi; Nicholas Kohn; Na-Yung Yu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

9.  Category labels versus feature labels: category labels polarize inferential predictions.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Na-Yung Yu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

10.  Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: evidence for developmental change.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Daniel Brickman; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.