Literature DB >> 14618315

Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms.

H J van Brummen1, G van de Pol, C I M Aalders, A P M Heintz, C H van der Vaart.   

Abstract

One hundred and three women underwent sacrospinous hysteropexy (n=54) or vaginal hysterectomy with a vaginal vault suspension (n=49) for the management of descensus uteri. They were sent a postal questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios. Seventy-four (72%) women responded. The adjusted odds ratios for urge incontinence is 3.4 (1.0-12.3) and for overactive bladder 2.9 (0.5-16.9) greater after vaginal hysterectomy. The women recovered significantly more quickly after sacrospinous hysteropexy. There were no differences in anatomical outcome or recurrence rate. When performed to correct a descensus uteri of grade 2 or more we found that vaginal hysterectomy is associated with a three times higher risk for urge incontinence and overactive bladder symptoms. In addition, the women who underwent sacrospinous hysteropexy also reported a quicker recovery from surgery. Sacrospinous hysteropexy, therefore, appears to be promising for the correction of descensus uteri.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618315     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-003-1084-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  24 in total

1.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Treatment of uterine and vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  G W Morley
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation.

Authors:  W F Baden; T A Walker
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Sacrospinous fixation for massive eversion of the vagina.

Authors:  D H Nichols
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?

Authors:  C F Maher; M P Cary; M C Slack; C J Murray; M Milligan; P Schluter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

7.  Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Authors:  J S Brown; G Sawaya; D H Thom; D Grady
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.

Authors:  C Huub van der Vaart; J Rob J de Leeuw; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; A Peter M Heintz
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 9.  Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women.

Authors:  D A Richardson; R J Scotti; D R Ostergard
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Sacrospinous fixation for the prolapsed vaginal vault.

Authors:  U Ozcan; T Güngör; M Ekin; S Eken
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.031

View more
  30 in total

1.  The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Joyce de Jong; Marieke Huisman; Steven Schraffordt Koops; Peter Heintz; Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-24

2.  Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ?

Authors:  Lauri J Romanzi; Renuka Tyagi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 4.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Is hysterectomy or the use of graft necessary for the reconstructive surgery for uterine prolapse?

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Hyun Joo Jung; Hyun Jung Choi; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-10-10

7.  A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent.

Authors:  Susanne D Thys; Anne- Lotte Coolen; Ingrid R Martens; Herman P Oosterbaan; Jan- Paul W R Roovers; Ben- Willem Mol; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Hysterectomy with uterosacral suspension or Uphold™ hysteropexy in women with apical prolapse: a parallel cohort study.

Authors:  Mugdha Kulkarni; Natharnia Young; Joseph Lee; Anna Rosamilia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Anterior vaginal mesh sacrospinous hysteropexy and posterior fascial plication for anterior compartment dominated uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Benjamin Feiner; Lieke Gietelink; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.