Literature DB >> 14618312

Predictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgery.

H Kilicarslan1, G Gokce, S Ayan, T Guvenal, K Kaya, E Y Gultekin.   

Abstract

Pubovaginal sling procedures are being performed with increased frequency for stress urinary incontinence. The vaginal wall sling was introduced in 1989 by Raz et al., and its success rate has been reported as being 61%-100%. A number of recent studies have identified that some patient factors may influence the likelihood of a successful outcome. In the present study, we evaluated whether preoperative Valsalva leak-point pressure and urethral pressure profile can be used as predictors of success after surgery. We identified the preoperative characteristics of 58 women who underwent an isolated in situ anterior vaginal wall sling procedure by the same surgeon. Patients' ages, previous anti-incontinence procedures, hormone replacement status and previous hysterectomies were determined and patients underwent urodynamics, including cystometry, measurement of the Valsalva leak-point pressure and urethral pressure profile (maximal urethral pressure). After the vaginal wall sling procedure, success was defined as a significant improvement in stress urinary incontinence symptoms or no symptoms at all. The 58 women ranged from 41 to-71 years old (average 52.3) and average follow-up was 26 months (range 16-34). An anti-incontinence procedure had been done previously in 15% of cases. The success rate was 65.4% in patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure < 50 cmH2O and maximal urethral pressure < 30 cmH2O, but it was 90.6% in patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure 50 cmH2O or higher and maximal urethral pressure 30 cmH2O or more. Patients with Valsalva leak-point pressure 50 cmH2O or higher and maximal urethral pressure 30 cmH2O or more had a 90.6% success rate, and it was significantly higher than the success rate of patients with lower values for both parameters. We concluded that preoperative Valsalva leak-point pressure and maximal urethral pressure can be used to estimate the success rate of anterior vaginal wall sling procedures. When of these parameters are concurrently high, the outcome of surgery seems more favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14618312     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-003-1085-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  11 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience.

Authors:  S A Kaplan; A E Te; G P Young; A Andrade; M A Cabelin; E F Ikeguchi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Complications of bladder neck suspension procedures.

Authors:  M J Kelly; P E Zimmern; G E Leach
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Success and patient satisfaction following the Stamey procedure for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  G T Walker; J H Texter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The use of bone anchoring in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  R A Appell
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The in situ anterior vaginal wall sling: predictors of success.

Authors:  H B Goldman; R R Rackley; R A Appell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Is modified in situ vaginal wall sling operation the treatment of choice for recurrent genuine stress incontinence?

Authors:  T H Su; J P Huang; Y L Wang; J M Yang; H J Wei; C L Huang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Comparison of fascial and vaginal wall slings in the management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency.

Authors:  S A Kaplan; R P Santarosa; A E Te
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Vaginal wall sling: long-term outcome analysis of factors contributing to patients satisfaction and surgical success.

Authors:  S E Litwiller; R S Nelson; P D Fone; K B Kim; A R Stone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Vaginal wall sling for anatomical incontinence and intrinsic sphincter dysfunction: efficacy and outcome analysis.

Authors:  S Raz; L Stothers; G P Young; J Short; B Marks; A Chopra; G R Wahle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Correction of recurrent stress urinary incontinence by needle urethropexy with a vaginal wall sling.

Authors:  R W Pidutti; S W George; A Morales
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-04
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Are multichannel urodynamics required prior to surgery in a woman with stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Arthur Mourtzinos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Comparison of midurethral sling outcomes with and without concomitant prolapse repair.

Authors:  E Jung Han; Soo Rim Kim; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

3.  Could the vaginal wall sling still have a role after FDA's warning? the functional outcomes at 20 years.

Authors:  Ester Illiano; Francesco Trama; Alessandro Marchesi; Consuelo Fabi; Stefano Brancorsini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  Use of urodynamics prior to surgery for urinary incontinence: How helpful is preoperative testing?

Authors:  Gary E Lemack
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.