Literature DB >> 9372581

The use of bone anchoring in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.

R A Appell1.   

Abstract

Recent reviews have noted failures of transvaginal surgical procedures designed to cure female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Modifications continue to be applied to improve the transvaginal approach, including anchoring of the supporting sutures to the pelvic bones, reduction of the transvaginal dissection to help reduce further prolapse, and simpler techniques to allow a wider use of sling procedures. This paper reports on the use of a bone-anchoring technique and preservation of the endopelvic fascia in both transvaginal suspension surgery for hypermobility and sling surgery for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. Results show an 81.7% cure rate in 71 patients who underwent the bone-anchor suspension and were followed for at least 3 years; a 97.5% cure rate in 40 patients who underwent an in situ sling procedure with bone anchoring and were followed for at least 2 years; and a 94% cure rate in 78 patients who underwent a sling procedure with autologous or synthetic material and bone anchoring and were followed for at least 2 years. The use of this bone-anchoring technique and preservation of the endopelvic fascia appears to enhance the success rate without increasing the risk to the patient and, as minimally invasive procedures, reduce the surgery time and the length of hospitalization, thus reducing costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372581     DOI: 10.1007/bf02202015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of female incontinence secondary to urethral damage or loss.

Authors:  J G Blaivas
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  G E Leach; R R Dmochowski; R A Appell; J G Blaivas; H R Hadley; K M Luber; J L Mostwin; P D O'Donnell; C G Roehrborn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension.

Authors:  V F MARSHALL; A A MARCHETTI; K E KRANTZ
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1949-04

4.  A new look at pelvic relaxation.

Authors:  A C Richardson; J B Lyon; N L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Percutaneous bladder neck suspension.

Authors:  G E Leach; R Appell
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  T A Stamey
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-04

7.  Bone fixation technique for transvaginal needle suspension.

Authors:  G E Leach
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Modified bladder neck suspension for female stress incontinence.

Authors:  S Raz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Bladder neck suspension material investigated in a rabbit model.

Authors:  R C Bruskewitz; K T Nielsen; P H Graversen; W D Saville; T C Gasser
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  No-incision pubovaginal suspension for stress incontinence.

Authors:  R F Gittes; K R Loughlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Modified insitu vaginal wall sling in stress incontinence.

Authors:  A Metin; O Kayigil; S I Ahmed
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Bone-anchored suburethral sling: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Predictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgery.

Authors:  H Kilicarslan; G Gokce; S Ayan; T Guvenal; K Kaya; E Y Gultekin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-09-19

4.  Is the efficacy of in situ vaginal wall slings decreasing in the late follow-up?

Authors:  Ahmet Metin; Onder Kayigil; S Iftekhar Ahmed; Ali Fuat Atmaca
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Could the vaginal wall sling still have a role after FDA's warning? the functional outcomes at 20 years.

Authors:  Ester Illiano; Francesco Trama; Alessandro Marchesi; Consuelo Fabi; Stefano Brancorsini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.