S A Kaplan1, R P Santarosa, A E Te. 1. Department of Urology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare safety and efficacy of fascial versus vaginal wall slings in the management of women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). METHODS: The hospital and office records of 79 consecutive women with ISD were retrospectively analyzed from January 1991 to September 1995. There were 43 fascial slings (group A) and 36 vaginal wall slings (group B). Parameter of evaluation included efficacy based on postoperative presence of stress or urge incontinence and number of pads used, complications, and miscellaneous factors, including length of catheterization time, length of hospitalization, quantity of analgesics used, and loss of work days. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and urodynamic data were the same for both groups. Pad use decreased from 6.9 to 0.6 for group A and from 5.7 to 0.3 for group B. Persistent stress and urge incontinence was present in 5% and 16% of group A patients and in 3% and 11% of group B patients, respectively. Group A (89%) and group B (94%) patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their surgical outcome. The operative time, hospital days, and days lost from work for group B patients (42.3 +/- 13.4 minutes, 1.4 +/- 0.9 days, 18.4 +/- 3.2 days, respectively) were significantly lower than for group A patients (84.2 +/- 17.8 minutes, 3.7 +/- 1.9 days, 28.4 +/- 7.8 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both fascial and vaginal wall slings are effective in treating women with ISD. However, the use of vaginal wall slings resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay, decreased catheterization time, decreased use of analgesics, and decreased loss of days of work compared with fascial slings. Therefore, the vaginal wall sling should be the preferred surgical method of treating sphincter deficiency.
OBJECTIVES: To compare safety and efficacy of fascial versus vaginal wall slings in the management of women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). METHODS: The hospital and office records of 79 consecutive women with ISD were retrospectively analyzed from January 1991 to September 1995. There were 43 fascial slings (group A) and 36 vaginal wall slings (group B). Parameter of evaluation included efficacy based on postoperative presence of stress or urge incontinence and number of pads used, complications, and miscellaneous factors, including length of catheterization time, length of hospitalization, quantity of analgesics used, and loss of work days. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and urodynamic data were the same for both groups. Pad use decreased from 6.9 to 0.6 for group A and from 5.7 to 0.3 for group B. Persistent stress and urge incontinence was present in 5% and 16% of group A patients and in 3% and 11% of group B patients, respectively. Group A (89%) and group B (94%) patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their surgical outcome. The operative time, hospital days, and days lost from work for group B patients (42.3 +/- 13.4 minutes, 1.4 +/- 0.9 days, 18.4 +/- 3.2 days, respectively) were significantly lower than for group A patients (84.2 +/- 17.8 minutes, 3.7 +/- 1.9 days, 28.4 +/- 7.8 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both fascial and vaginal wall slings are effective in treating women with ISD. However, the use of vaginal wall slings resulted in significantly shorter hospital stay, decreased catheterization time, decreased use of analgesics, and decreased loss of days of work compared with fascial slings. Therefore, the vaginal wall sling should be the preferred surgical method of treating sphincter deficiency.