Literature DB >> 1461766

Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.

C D Meade1, D M Howser.   

Abstract

This study investigated the reading level estimates of cancer clinical trial consent forms from actively accruing studies at the Medicine Branch and the Clinical Pharmacology Branch of the National Cancer Institute. Forty-four consent forms were analyzed using the SMOG formula. Readability levels ranged from grade 12 to grade 17.5 (mean = 14.3). The conclusion was that these consent forms were written above most subjects' reading levels. The usefulness of consent forms could be improved significantly by using readability formulas, applying rewriting techniques, and being aware of subjects' comprehension levels. This paper suggests a number of strategies that nurses can use to enhance comprehension of the information contained in informed consent documents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; National Cancer Institute

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  12 in total

Review 1.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

2.  Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Danny T Y Wu; David A Hanauer; Qiaozhu Mei; Patricia M Clark; Lawrence C An; Joshua Proulx; Qing T Zeng; V G Vinod Vydiswaran; Kevyn Collins-Thompson; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Leo S Morales; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials.

Authors:  P R Ferguson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Readability estimates for commonly used health-related quality of life surveys.

Authors:  Sylvia H Paz; Honghu Liu; Marie N Fongwa; Leo S Morales; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Comprehensibility of translated informed consent documents used in clinical research in psychiatry.

Authors:  Venu Gopal Jhanwar; Ram Jeevan Bishnoi
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2010-01

9.  Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.

Authors:  Emma L Verástegui
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Carlos Nakamura; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.