Literature DB >> 14616428

Diltiazem co-treatment in renal transplant patients receiving microemulsion cyclosporin.

Cyrus R Kumana1, Matthew K L Tong, Chun-Sang Li, Ian J Lauder, Joseph S K Lee, Maybelle Kou, Tom Walley, Alan Haycox, Tak Mao Chan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Usage of cyclosporin (the Hong Kong Hospital Authority's single largest item of drug expenditure) continues to increase, mainly due to increasing numbers of renal allograft patients taking it as long-term antirejection therapy. Diltiazem, an antihypertensive agent, interferes with the first pass extraction of oral cyclosporin, thus serving to conserve its dosage. AIMS: In renal transplant patients, to assess whether diltiazem co-treatment could achieve worthwhile dosage conservation of Neoral (a relatively new microemulsified cyclosporin formulation), safely.
METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was undertaken at three local hospitals. Renal transplant recipients receiving Neoral as prophylactic immunosuppression were randomized to two treatment arms. Active treatment consisted of diltiazem tablets 30 or 60 mg twice daily for patients weighing < 60 or >or= 60 kg, respectively. One hundred and ten eligible patients gave their informed consent, and were followed up for at least six months. The mean difference in the dollar cost in the sixth month was the primary outcome. Secondary/ancillary outcomes included changes in cyclosporin dosage and blood level, and untoward clinical events including rejection. Outcomes were evaluated by intention to treat analyses.
RESULTS: During weeks 23-26 (sixth month) post randomization, diltiazem co-treatment yielded an estimated average cost saving per patient on drugs of 15%[the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference being HK dollars 609 +/- 517 or pound 50 +/- 42], with no apparent excess of untoward or adverse events, complications, hospitalization, outpatient visits, or inferior quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: This diltiazem co-treatment regime applied to the nearly 1800 surviving renal allograft patients followed up in Hospital Authority hospitals could have saved approximately HK dollars 14.3 million ( pound 1.17 million) annually, without adverse sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14616428      PMCID: PMC1884301          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01908.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  31 in total

Review 1.  Advances in cyclosporine pharmacology, measurement, and therapeutic monitoring.

Authors:  L M Shaw
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  In vivo evaluation of the effects of altered cyclosporine metabolism on its immunosuppressive potency.

Authors:  G Babany; R E Morris; I Babany; S Shepherd; R E Kates
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Pharmacokinetic interactions between microemulsion formulated cyclosporine A and diltiazem in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Asberg; H Christensen; A Hartmann; E Carlson; E Molden; K J Berg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The cyclosporine-sparing effects of diltiazem in renal transplantation.

Authors:  J McCauley; R J Ptachcinski; R Shapiro
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Biologic significance of cyclosporine metabolites.

Authors:  B Ryffel; B M Foxwell; M J Mihatsch; P Donatsch; G Maurer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  The effect of food and bile acid administration on the relative bioavailability of cyclosporin.

Authors:  A Lindholm; S Henricsson; R Dahlqvist
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Effect of cyclosporine, cyclosporine metabolite 17, and other cyclosporine-related compounds on T lymphocyte clones derived from rejected human kidney grafts. I. Inhibition of proliferation.

Authors:  D Chabannes; J F Moreau; J P Soulillou
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with cyclosporin (Part I).

Authors:  G C Yee; T R McGuire
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A J Wagstaff; C M Perry; G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Cyclosporine metabolism in human liver: identification of a cytochrome P-450III gene family as the major cyclosporine-metabolizing enzyme explains interactions of cyclosporine with other drugs.

Authors:  T Kronbach; V Fischer; U A Meyer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Robert J Brooks; Gail Y Higgins; Angela C Webster
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Modulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferative response by diltiazem : in vitro comparison in younger versus older subjects.

Authors:  Antonella D'Ambrosio; Luciana Giordani; Manuela Colucci; Nicola Vanacore; Francesca Quintieri
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Calcium channel blockers for preventing acute tubular necrosis in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  I R Shilliday; M Sherif
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 4.  Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Nicholas B Cross; Angela C Webster; Philip Masson; Philip J O'Connell; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.