BACKGROUND: In some nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant recipients. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of any antihypertensive agent applied to kidney transplant recipients for at least two weeks were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Study quality, transplant outcomes and other patient centred outcomes were assessed using random effects meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 60 studies, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine studies (2262 participants) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) to placebo/no treatment, 10 studies (445 participants) compared angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) to placebo/no treatment and seven studies (405 participants) compared CCB to ACEi. CCB compared to placebo/no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR), (MD, 4.45 mL/min, 95% CI 2.22 to 6.68). Data on ACEi versus placebo/no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.07 mL/min, 95% CI -18.57 to 2.43), and variable for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD -11.48 mL/min, 95% CI -5.75 to -7.21), proteinuria (MD -0.28 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.10), haemoglobin (MD -12.96 g/L, 95% CI -5.72 to -10.21) and increased hyperkalaemia (RR 3.74, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.43). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.37, 95% CI 0.39 to 140.35). Other drug comparisons were compared in small numbers of participants and studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. ACEi have some detrimental effects in kidney transplant recipients. More high quality studies reporting patient centred outcomes are required.
BACKGROUND: In some nontransplant populations, effects of different antihypertensive drug classes vary. Relative effects in kidney transplant recipients are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant recipients. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of any antihypertensive agent applied to kidney transplant recipients for at least two weeks were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Study quality, transplant outcomes and other patient centred outcomes were assessed using random effects meta-analysis. Risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 60 studies, enrolling 3802 recipients. Twenty-nine studies (2262 participants) compared calcium channel blockers (CCB) to placebo/no treatment, 10 studies (445 participants) compared angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) to placebo/no treatment and seven studies (405 participants) compared CCB to ACEi. CCB compared to placebo/no treatment (plus additional agents in either arm as required) reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR), (MD, 4.45 mL/min, 95% CI 2.22 to 6.68). Data on ACEi versus placebo/no treatment were inconclusive for GFR (MD -8.07 mL/min, 95% CI -18.57 to 2.43), and variable for graft loss, precluding meta-analysis. In direct comparison with CCB, ACEi decreased GFR (MD -11.48 mL/min, 95% CI -5.75 to -7.21), proteinuria (MD -0.28 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.10), haemoglobin (MD -12.96 g/L, 95% CI -5.72 to -10.21) and increased hyperkalaemia (RR 3.74, 95% CI 1.89 to 7.43). Graft loss data were inconclusive (RR 7.37, 95% CI 0.39 to 140.35). Other drug comparisons were compared in small numbers of participants and studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CCB may be preferred as first line agents for hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. ACEi have some detrimental effects in kidney transplant recipients. More high quality studies reporting patient centred outcomes are required.
Authors: Thomas R McCune; Duane G Wombolt; Thomas V Whelan; Leroy R Thacker; John O Colonna Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: J D Pirsch; A M D'Alessandro; E B Roecker; S J Knechtle; A Reed; H W Sollinger; M Kalayoglu; F O Belzer Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Matthew R Weir; Ellen D Burgess; James E Cooper; Andrew Z Fenves; David Goldsmith; Dianne McKay; Anita Mehrotra; Mark M Mitsnefes; Domenic A Sica; Sandra J Taler Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: N Divac; R Naumović; A Ristić; M Milinković; V Brković; S Jovičić Pavlović; A Glišić; R Stojanović; M Prostran Journal: Herz Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Iftach Sagy; Alina Vodonos; Victor Novack; Boris Rogachev; Yosef S Haviv; Leonid Barski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Asad Ali; Muhammad Abu Zar; Ahmad Kamal; Amber E Faquih; Chandur Bhan; Waleed Iftikhar; Muhammad Bilal Malik; Malik Qistas Ahmad; Nouman Safdar Ali; Shahzad Ahmed Sami; Fnu Jitidhar; Abbas M Cheema; Annum Zulfiqar Journal: Cureus Date: 2018-08-29