Woodie M Zachry1, Edward P Armstrong. 1. College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, 1703 E. Mabel Street, P.O. Box 210207, Tucson, AZ 85721-0207, USA. zachry@pharmacy.arizona.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of health care professionals in examining the uses of pharmacogenomic data. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire elicited respondent perceptions of how the use of pharmacogenomic information would impact the provision of health-related services (7-point scale: 7=strongly increase to 1=strongly decrease). Respondents were also asked to describe their level of agreement to statements related to how pharmacogenomic information should be used (7-point scale: 7=strongly agree to 1=strongly disagree). One-sample t tests were used to investigate significant differences from the midpoint value of each scale. Survey participants were attendees of a policy conference entitled.Pharmacogenomics: Implications for Patients, Providers, and Payers. sponsored by the university college of pharmacy. RESULTS: Respondents believed the use of pharmacogenomic information would affect several areas of health care, including the cost of insurance premiums (P<0.001), the use of confidential medical information (P=0.024), patient access to therapy (P=0.005), and the impact of physician/patient preferences in selecting treatment choices (P<0.001). Furthermore, respondents felt it should be used to help treat patients (P<0.001), help patients/physicians make therapy choices (P<0.001), create treatment guidelines (P<0.001), conduct research (P<0.001), justify refusals of therapy (P=0.014), and budget for future expenditures (P<0.001). Respondents also believed the information should not be used for setting copay amounts (P=0.002), determining insurance premiums (P<0.001), or in the negotiation of insurance contracts (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The respondents to this survey appeared optimistic about the use of pharmacogenomic information, and their responses provided a proactive framework to discuss the potential use and misuse of this technology.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of health care professionals in examining the uses of pharmacogenomic data. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire elicited respondent perceptions of how the use of pharmacogenomic information would impact the provision of health-related services (7-point scale: 7=strongly increase to 1=strongly decrease). Respondents were also asked to describe their level of agreement to statements related to how pharmacogenomic information should be used (7-point scale: 7=strongly agree to 1=strongly disagree). One-sample t tests were used to investigate significant differences from the midpoint value of each scale. Survey participants were attendees of a policy conference entitled.Pharmacogenomics: Implications for Patients, Providers, and Payers. sponsored by the university college of pharmacy. RESULTS: Respondents believed the use of pharmacogenomic information would affect several areas of health care, including the cost of insurance premiums (P<0.001), the use of confidential medical information (P=0.024), patient access to therapy (P=0.005), and the impact of physician/patient preferences in selecting treatment choices (P<0.001). Furthermore, respondents felt it should be used to help treat patients (P<0.001), help patients/physicians make therapy choices (P<0.001), create treatment guidelines (P<0.001), conduct research (P<0.001), justify refusals of therapy (P=0.014), and budget for future expenditures (P<0.001). Respondents also believed the information should not be used for setting copay amounts (P=0.002), determining insurance premiums (P<0.001), or in the negotiation of insurance contracts (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The respondents to this survey appeared optimistic about the use of pharmacogenomic information, and their responses provided a proactive framework to discuss the potential use and misuse of this technology.
Authors: Jaedon P Avey; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julie A Beans; Susan Brown Trinidad; Rachel F Tyndale; Renee F Robinson Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Jennifer L Shaw; Renee Robinson; Helene Starks; Wylie Burke; Denise A Dillard Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Chandrama Mukherjee; Kevin M Sweet; Jasmine A Luzum; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Michael F Christman; Joseph P Kitzmiller Journal: Per Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Laney K Jones; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Michael R Gionfriddo; Janet L Williams; Audrey L Fan; Rebecca A Pulk; Eric A Wright; Marc S Williams Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.689