Literature DB >> 21623646

Attitudes of health care professionals toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Nathalie K Zgheib1, Thalia Arawi, Rami A Mahfouz, Ramzi Sabra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a new tool for the optimization of drug therapy. Although the pharmacogenetics concept was first recognized at least 50 years ago, clinical testing to determine pharmacogenetic traits is still relatively rare, and many hurdles are markedly slowing its development. There is a lot of literature and speculation about potential ethical challenges in genetic and pharmacogenetic testing, yet few researchers have actually examined the attitudes of health care professionals regarding the clinical application of these tests.
OBJECTIVE: In this article, we aim to review the current literature on health care professionals' perceptions of the role of pharmacogenetic data and describe the attitudes of medical students when faced with a clinical pharmacogenetic testing scenario.
METHODS: A group of 59 third-year medical students from the American University of Beirut Medical Center were asked to answer a questionnaire about pharmacogenetic testing after being exposed to a clinical scenario of a patient who was diagnosed with mild Alzheimer Disease (AD) and hence was a candidate for therapy with one of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors.
RESULTS: The students indicated that they would respect patients' confidentiality and inform them about the test results and therapeutic plan, but they would not be as open about bad prognoses. They did not agree on the therapeutic plan that would follow a pharmacogenetic test result and were uncertain about potential patient discrimination in insurability.
CONCLUSION: Our and others' findings demonstrate the existence and seriousness of several challenges pertaining to pharmacogenetic applications in the clinical setting. Further training and education are needed for health care professionals, since they are the ones who will most probably request these tests in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21623646     DOI: 10.1007/BF03256401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  50 in total

1.  The genetics revolution, economics, ethics, and insurance.

Authors:  Patrick L Brockett; E Susan Tankersley
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  1997-11

Review 2.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pharmacogenetics: ethical issues and policy options.

Authors:  Allen Buchanan; Andrea Califano; Jeffrey Kahn; Elizabeth McPherson; John Robertson; Baruch Brody
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2002-03

4.  Tailor-made pharmacotherapy: future developments and ethical challenges in the field of pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Johannes van Delden; Ineke Bolt; Annemarie Kalis; Jeroen Derijks; Hubert Leufkens
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Putting pharmacogenetics into practice.

Authors:  Michael M Hopkins; Dolores Ibarreta; Sibylle Gaisser; Christien M Enzing; Jim Ryan; Paul A Martin; Graham Lewis; Symone Detmar; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Adam M Hedgecoe; Paul Nightingale; Marieke Dreiling; K Juliane Hartig; Wieneke Vullings; Tony Forde
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics and ethical considerations: why care?

Authors:  L Marx-Stölting
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Pharmacogenetics in Europe: barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  D Gurwitz; E Zika; M M Hopkins; S Gaisser; D Ibarreta
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Association between CYP2C9 genetic variants and anticoagulation-related outcomes during warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell K Higashi; David L Veenstra; L Midori Kondo; Ann K Wittkowsky; Sengkeo L Srinouanprachanh; Fred M Farin; Allan E Rettie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Bioethics for clinicians: 14. Ethics and genetics in medicine.

Authors:  M M Burgess; C M Laberge; B M Knoppers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-05-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Society and ethics - the genetics of disease.

Authors:  Sandy M Thomas
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.578

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomics in Primary Care: A Crucial Entry Point for Global Personalized Medicine?

Authors:  Gillian Bartlett; Nathalie Zgheib; Aresha Manamperi; Wei Wang; Candan Hizel; Rabia Kahveci; Yasemin Yazan
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2012

2.  Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Victoria S Marshe; Ilona Gorbovskaya; Sarah Kanji; Maxine Kish; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Prescriber Attitudes Toward Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Family Medicine Residency Program.

Authors:  Alyssa Gallipani; Rebecca Cope; Briann Fischetti; Sherly Abraham; Arvind Ankireddypalli
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2018-10-11

6.  Opportunities for personalizing colorectal cancer care: an analysis of SEER-medicare data.

Authors:  Zachary T Rivers; Helen M Parsons; Pamala A Jacobson; Karen M Kuntz; Joel F Farley; David J Stenehjem
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.245

7.  Pharmacogenomics in children: advantages and challenges of next generation sequencing applications.

Authors:  O M Vanakker; A De Paepe
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.