Literature DB >> 14612515

Genetic pathways and genome-wide determinants of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer.

Rosa-Ana Risques1, Victor Moreno, Maria Ribas, Eugenio Marcuello, Gabriel Capellà, Miguel A Peinado.   

Abstract

Various studies have suggested the existence of different pathways of tumor progression in colorectal cancer that associate with specific molecular, chromosomal, and clinicopathological features. We hypothesize that a comprehensive analysis of cumulated genomic damage in colorectal cancers would aid the characterization of different tumor progression pathways and identify the factors determining clinical outcome of tumors of each type. Genome-wide disruption was studied by DNA fingerprinting in a series of 129 sporadic colorectal carcinomas. These results, taken together with data for DNA ploidy, microsatellite instability, p53, and K-ras mutations and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, have been used to classify colorectal carcinomas. The following five groups can be defined based on the type and level of cumulated genomic damage: (a) tumors with microsatellite instability, right location, and good prognosis; (b) diploid tumors lacking p53 mutations, left and right location, low subchromosomal damage, and bad prognosis; (c) diploid tumors with p53 mutations, left location, high levels of subchromosomal damage, and good prognosis; (d) high aneuploid tumors, p53 mutations, left location, high levels of numerical and structural chromosomal alterations, and bad prognosis; and finally (e) low aneuploid tumors, no p53 mutations, left and right location, low levels of structural chromosomal alterations, and good prognosis. We postulate that these groups represent alternative pathways of tumor progression, each with determinants of aggressiveness. This indicates a need for different prognostic assessments depending on which group the tumor belongs to.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14612515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  13 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prognosis: is it all mutation, mutation, mutation?

Authors:  A B Hassan; C Paraskeva
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Aneuploidy and elevated CEA indicate an increased risk for metachronous metastasis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Verena Bente; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Helena Voulgaris; Martina Oberländer; Katharina Schillo; Markus Kleemann; Conny Bürk; Hans-Peter Bruch; Uwe J Roblick; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Integrative functional genomics analysis of sustained polyploidy phenotypes in breast cancer cells identifies an oncogenic profile for GINS2.

Authors:  Juha K Rantala; Henrik Edgren; Laura Lehtinen; Maija Wolf; Kristine Kleivi; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Anna-Riina Aaltola; Petra Laasola; Sami Kilpinen; Petri Saviranta; Kristiina Iljin; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 4.  DNA fingerprinting techniques for the analysis of genetic and epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Johanna K Samuelsson; Sergio Alonso; Fumiichiro Yamamoto; Manuel Perucho
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Stage-specific frequency and prognostic significance of aneuploidy in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer--a meta-analysis and current overview.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Michael Linnebacher; Alexandra König; Brigitte Vollmar; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Microsatellite instability in Ewing tumor is not associated with loss of mismatch repair protein expression.

Authors:  I Alldinger; K L Schaefer; D Goedde; L Ottaviano; U Dirksen; A Ranft; H Juergens; H E Gabbert; W T Knoefel; C Poremba
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Targeting karyotypic complexity and chromosomal instability of cancer cells.

Authors:  Anna V Roschke; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.465

9.  Hydrophobic bile acids, genomic instability, Darwinian selection, and colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Claire M Payne; Carol Bernstein; Katerina Dvorak; Harris Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-16

10.  Molecular gate keepers succumb to gene aberrations in colorectal cancer in Kashmiri population, revealing a high incidence area.

Authors:  A Syed Sameer; Shakeel ul Rehman; Arshad A Pandith; Nidda Syeed; Zaffar A Shah; Nissar A Chowdhri; Khursheed A Wani; Mushtaq A Siddiqi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.