Literature DB >> 14608639

Biosafety concerns for shared flow cytometry core facilities.

Ingrid Schmid1, Steven Merlin, Stephen P Perfetto.   

Abstract

Many researchers who need flow cytometry for their projects have neither sufficient funds nor the work volume to justify the purchase of an analytic cytometer or cell sorter. In shared flow cytometry facilities, costs for instrument purchases, cytometer maintenance, and personnel are pooled to provide economic services for a multitude of users when they are required. Owing to the diverse nature of the samples that are submitted to core facilities, the biohazard potential of the samples can vary dramatically. For the safety of facility personnel and users, it is critical that information about hazards contained in the samples be transmitted to instrument operators before flow cytometry experiments are started. During 1999 the former Biosafety Committee of the International Society for Analytical Cytology formulated a framework biosafety questionnaire for shared facilities designed to request information about the hazard potential of experimental samples from investigators who wish to use the facility. In this report we review safety issues that are pertinent to flow cytometry core facilities by discussing the individual components of this biosafety questionnaire. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608639     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.10085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based biosafety: a review of the principles and effectiveness of microbiological containment measures.

Authors:  Tjeerd G Kimman; Eric Smit; Michèl R Klein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry cell sorter biosafety standards.

Authors:  Kevin L Holmes; Benjamin Fontes; Philip Hogarth; Richard Konz; Simon Monard; Charles H Pletcher; Robert B Wadley; Ingrid Schmid; Stephen P Perfetto
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 3.  How to develop a standard operating procedure for sorting unfixed cells.

Authors:  Ingrid Schmid
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Standard practice for cell sorting in a BSL-3 facility.

Authors:  Stephen P Perfetto; David R Ambrozak; Richard Nguyen; Mario Roederer; Richard A Koup; Kevin L Holmes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

5.  Nearly finished genomes produced using gel microdroplet culturing reveal substantial intraspecies genomic diversity within the human microbiome.

Authors:  Michael S Fitzsimons; Mark Novotny; Chien-Chi Lo; Armand E K Dichosa; Joyclyn L Yee-Greenbaum; Jeremy P Snook; Wei Gu; Olga Chertkov; Karen W Davenport; Kim McMurry; Krista G Reitenga; Ashlynn R Daughton; Jian He; Shannon L Johnson; Cheryl D Gleasner; Patti L Wills; Beverly Parson-Quintana; Patrick S Chain; John C Detter; Roger S Lasken; Cliff S Han
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Cell-type-specific Jumonji histone demethylase gene expression in the healthy rat CNS: detection by a novel flow cytometry method.

Authors:  Stephanie M C Smith; Rebecca S Kimyon; Jyoti J Watters
Journal:  ASN Neuro       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.146

7.  Air sampling to assess potential generation of aerosolized viable bacteria during flow cytometric analysis of unfixed bacterial suspensions.

Authors:  Christine F Carson; Timothy Jj Inglis
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2018-02-27

Review 8.  Biosafety during a pandemic: shared resource laboratories rise to the challenge.

Authors:  Avrill M Aspland; Iyadh Douagi; Andrew Filby; Evan R Jellison; Lola Martinez; Diana Shinko; Adrian L Smith; Vera A Tang; Sherry Thornton
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.