Literature DB >> 14608319

Biomechanical testing of hamstring graft tibial tunnel fixation with bioabsorbable interference screws.

David N M Caborn1, John Nyland, Jeff Selby, Onur Tetik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the failure mode, maximum load at failure, displacement at failure, and stiffness differences of quadrupled hamstring graft-tibial tunnel fixation using 28-mm, tapered 35-mm, or bicortical 17- and 20-mm bioabsorbable interference screws (Arthrex, Naples, FL). TYPE OF STUDY: Biomechanical study.
METHODS: Nine matched pairs (18 specimens) of young cadaver tibias (mean bone mineral density [BMD] = 0.847 g/cm2, range, 0.689 to 1.11 g/cm2) were divided into 3 groups of 6 specimens. Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests post hoc comparisons were used to assess group differences (P <.05).
RESULTS: Maximum load at failure for the 28-mm screw was 488.2 +/- 197 N, with a displacement of 18.4 +/- 7.5 mm and a stiffness modulus of 38.9 +/- 7.0 N/mm. Maximum load at failure for the tapered 35-mm screw was 844.8 +/- 121.4 N, with a displacement of 15.3 +/- 1.6 mm and a stiffness modulus of 70.5 +/- 21.1 N/mm. Maximum load at failure for bicortical screw fixation was 543.7 +/- 266.5 N, with a displacement of 17.7 +/- 6.6 mm and a stiffness modulus of 57.7 +/- 14.9 N/mm. Fixation using the tapered 35-mm screw displayed greater maximum load at failure than either 28-mm screw fixation (P =.015) or bicortical screw fixation (P =.037). Significant differences were not evident for displacement. Both tapered 35-mm (P =.016) and bicortical screw (P =.026) fixation displayed greater stiffness than 28-mm screw fixation. All constructs failed by pullout.
CONCLUSIONS: Fixation using a single tapered 35-mm screw displayed increased maximum load at failure compared with the 28-mm screw or bicortical fixation. Both the tapered 35-mm screw and bicortical fixation showed greater stiffness than fixation using a 28-mm screw. Use of a single 35-mm screw for quadrupled hamstring graft-tibial tunnel fixation may be preferred for patients with poor tibial BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608319     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Bioabsorbable screw divergence angle, not tunnel preparation method influences soft tissue tendon graft-bone tunnel fixation in healthy bone.

Authors:  Andrew R Duffee; Jeffrey A Brunelli; John Nyland; Robert Burden; Akbar Nawab; David Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Recurrent locking of knee joint caused by intraarticular migration of bioabsorbable tibial interference screw after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Appelt; Martin Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A biomechanical comparison of the Delta screw and RetroScrew tibial fixation on initial intra-articular graft tension.

Authors:  Peter C Rhee; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Close-looped graft suturing improves mechanical properties of interference screw fixation in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  María Prado; Belén Martín-Castilla; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; José Miguel Serrano-Fernández; Ana Pérez-Blanca; Francisco Ezquerro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A comparison of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Mark Bowen; Guillaume Odry; Michel Collette; Xavier Cassard; Hubert Lanternier; Thierry De Polignac
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-10

6.  Significant Loss of ACL Graft Force With Tibial-Sided Soft Tissue Interference Screw Fixation Over 24 Hours: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Philipp Kruppa; Anne Flies; Dag Wulsten; Robert Collette; Georg N Duda; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Roland Becker; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-04

7.  The Proximal Tibia Loses Bone Mineral Density After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Measurement Technique and Validation of a Quantitative Computed Tomography Method.

Authors:  Erick M Marigi; David R Holmes; Naveen Murthy; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Diane L Dahm; Peter C Rhee; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-02

8.  In Vitro Testing of 2 Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Systems Versus Interference Screw for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gerardo L Garcés; Oscar Martel; Alejandro Yánez; Ignacio Manchado-Herrera; Luci M Motta
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.