Literature DB >> 26389653

Bedside Diagnosis in the Intensive Care Unit. Is Looking Overlooked?

Thomas S Metkus1, Bo Soo Kim2.   

Abstract

Bedside diagnosis, including but not limited to the physical examination, can be lifesaving in the setting of critical illness and is a core competency in both medical school and at the postgraduate level. Data as to the clinical usefulness of bedside diagnosis in the modern intensive care unit (ICU) is sparse, however, and there are no clinical guidelines addressing performance, interpretation, and usefulness of the bedside assessment in critically ill patients. Bedside assessment and physical examination are used in a heterogeneous manner across institutions and even across ICUs within the same institution, which has implications for medical education, patient care, and the overuse/misuse of diagnostic testing. In this commentary, we review the existing data addressing bedside diagnosis in the ICU, describe various models of bedside assessment use in the ICU based on our clinical practice and on the limited evidence base, share our practical "checklist-based" approach to bedside assessment in the critically ill patient, and advocate for more formal study of physical examination and bedside assessment in the ICU to enhance clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bedside diagnosis; clinical skills; critical care; patient–physician relationship; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26389653      PMCID: PMC4627420          DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201505-271OI

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  25 in total

1.  Usefulness of physical examination in detecting the presence or absence of anemia.

Authors:  J D Sapira
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-09

2.  Assessment of routine chest roentgenograms and the physical examination to confirm endotracheal tube position.

Authors:  W Brunel; D L Coleman; D E Schwartz; E Peper; N H Cohen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Continuous noninvasive monitoring of respiratory rate in critically ill patients.

Authors:  B Krieger; D Feinerman; A Zaron; F Bizousky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  The Rational Clinical Examination. Does this patient have abnormal central venous pressure?

Authors:  D J Cook; D L Simel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Falsely low pulse oximetry values in patients receiving docetaxel (Taxotere).

Authors:  Michael Paige; Philip E Bickler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  An observational study of attending rounds.

Authors:  M Miller; B Johnson; H L Greene; M Baier; S Nowlin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report.

Authors:  Sanjay Saint; Leigh Ann Higgins; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Carol Chenoweth
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Lichtenstein; Ivan Goldstein; Eric Mourgeon; Philippe Cluzel; Philippe Grenier; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Physical examination of venous pressure: a critical review.

Authors:  S R McGee
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Do textbooks of clinical examination contain information regarding the assessment of critically ill patients?

Authors:  Caroline J Cook; Gary B Smith
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.