Literature DB >> 14605798

Hip fracture risk assessment using composite indices of femoral neck strength: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Arun S Karlamangla1, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Jean Young, Gail A Greendale.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to examine the prediction of incident hip fracture risk by composite indices of femoral neck strength, constructed from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip. These indices integrate femoral neck size and body size with bone density, and reflect the structure's ability to withstand axial compressive forces and bending forces, and the ability to absorb energy in an impact. We studied a prospective cohort of community-dwelling women, 55 years or older at baseline, average age 72 years, that was established in 1988, with follow-up until 1998. Higher baseline values of each composite strength index were associated with lower risk of incident hip fracture in this cohort. After adjusting for age and body mass index, relative risks associated with each standard deviation increment in the composite indices were 0.39 for compression strength (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.60), 0.43 for bending strength (95% confidence interval 0.27-0.70), and 0.34 for impact strength (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.58). Larger bone size relative to body size was associated with lower risk of incident hip fracture. After adjusting for age, body mass index, and bone density, each standard deviation increment in femoral neck width normalized by body weight was associated with incident hip fracture relative risk of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.70). Our results suggest that composite indices of femoral neck strength, constructed from DXA measurements, have the potential to improve hip fracture risk assessment. This needs further exploration in larger cohorts and in different population sub-groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605798     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1513-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for hip fracture not related to bone mass and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B Allolio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  C G Alonso; M D Curiel; F H Carranza; R P Cano; A D Peréz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  A A Ismail; T W O'Neill; W Cockerill; J D Finn; J B Cannata; K Hoszowski; O Johnell; C Matthis; H Raspe; A Raspe; J Reeve; A J Silman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck.

Authors:  N Dalén; L G Hellström; B Jacobson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-10

6.  Relations between age, mineral density and mechanical properties of human femoral compacta.

Authors:  C B Smith; D A Smith
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-10

7.  Body size and hip fracture risk in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; R C Lipschutz; J A Cauley; D Seeley; M C Nevitt; J Scott; E S Orwoll; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; P Brys; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; K E Warden; W W Scott; G U Rao
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  48 in total

1.  Low skeletal muscle mass associates with low femoral neck strength, especially in older Korean women: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  B-J Kim; S H Ahn; H M Kim; S H Lee; J-M Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Diabetes and femoral neck strength: findings from the Hip Strength Across the Menopausal Transition Study.

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Carolyn J Crandall; Preethi Srikanthan; Gail A Greendale; Mei-Hua Huang; Michelle E Danielson; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Bone mineral mass in males and females with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  Fatima Baptista; Ana Varela; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Bivariate linkage study of proximal hip geometry and body size indices: the Framingham study.

Authors:  D Karasik; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; M C Mahaney; L M Havill; D P Kiel; S Demissie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Bone Health During the Menopause Transition and Beyond.

Authors:  Arun S Karlamangla; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Multisystem dysregulation and bone strength: findings from the study of midlife in the United States.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Arun S Karlamangla; Sharon Stein Merkin; Carolyn J Crandall; Neil Binkley; Gail A Greendale; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  C-reactive protein, bone strength, and nine-year fracture risk: data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Michelle E Danielson; Yasuyoshi Ouchi; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.