Literature DB >> 14605571

Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps.

James M Church1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colonic polyps are sometimes difficult to remove endoscopically and are referred for surgical resection. This study was performed to determine how many polyps referred for surgery could actually be managed endoscopically.
METHODS: An endoscopic database with data entered prospectively and consecutively was used to identify patients referred for surgery for a colonic polyp. Rectal polyps were excluded. All patients underwent colonoscopy before surgery to see if the polyp could be managed endoscopically. Cases were reviewed to see the method and outcome of treatment.
RESULTS: The study population consists of 58 patients referred for surgical resection of a colorectal polyp. Endoscopic polypectomy was initially successful in 48. Five of the 48 needed surgery later for a final success rate of 43/58 avoiding surgery. There were no deaths, four complications of endoscopic polypectomy (three bleeds, one post-polypectomy syndrome) and two patients had complications of surgery (one splenic injury, one ventral hernia). Polyps ranged in size from 1.5 cm to 8.0 cm. Seven polyps contained invasive cancer (three needing surgical resection), eight contained intramucosal cancer (one operated) and 11 had severe dysplasia (three operated). Rate of persistent polyp was 16/37 at first follow up, 7/23 at second, 1/14 at third and 0/8 at fourth.
CONCLUSION: Most polyps referred for surgical resection were successfully managed endoscopically. Patients with colonic polyps that are difficult or potentially dangerous to remove endoscopically should be sent for a second opinion before surgery is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605571     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6805-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  17 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for difficult polypectomy.

Authors:  Douglas B Nelson
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-10-25

Review 2.  A systematic review regarding the feasibility and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) for colonic lesions.

Authors:  Adela Brigic; Nicholas R A Symons; Omar Faiz; Chris Fraser; Susan K Clark; Robin H Kennedy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Luis Bujanda; Angel Cosme; Ines Gil; Juan I Arenas-Mirave
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Knife-assisted snare resection (KAR) of large and refractory colonic polyps at a Western centre: Feasibility, safety and efficacy study to guide future practice.

Authors:  Rupam Bhattacharyya; Fergus Jq Chedgy; Kesavan Kandiah; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal.

Authors:  S H Lo; W L Law
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Complex colon polypectomy.

Authors:  Juan F Gallegos-Orozco; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-06

7.  Physiologic effects of simultaneous carbon dioxide insufflation by laparoscopy and colonoscopy: prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Koiana Trencheva; Panchali Dhar; Toyooki Sonoda; Sang Lee; Jon Samuels; Brenna Stein; Jeffrey Milsom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding: how to minimize your patients' risk.

Authors:  Xian-rui Wu; James M Church; Awad Jarrar; Jennifer Liang; Matthew F Kalady
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Yasuo Kakugawa; Takuji Gotoda; Daphne Antillon; Yutaka Saito; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  When a polyp is not a polyp: incidental finding of a sigmoid schwannoma at first colonoscopic screening.

Authors:  Alexandra Leonard; Lezah P McCarthy; Danielle M Pastor
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.