Literature DB >> 14599257

How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?

Susana Lloret Segura1, Vicente Gonzalez-Roma.   

Abstract

Ambiguous response formats predict correlations from -.467 to -1 between opposite items, depending on whether the respondent's interpretation of the format is unipolar or bipolar. The authors present a procedure to investigate the proper interpretation in each case. It consists of applying nonparametric and parametric item response theory models (the Mokken and the graded response models) to pairs of opposite items in order to find the locations of the response options along the latent scale and, therefore, identify the response format construction. The authors tested this procedure on 4 samples (Ns=142-1,150) and 2 item pairs ("relaxed"-"tense" and "optimistic"-"pessimistic"). The results revealed that respondents constructed the formats as bipolar and supported the bipolarity of the item pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599257     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Affect as a Psychological Primitive.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Eliza Bliss-Moreau
Journal:  Adv Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009

2.  Spanish translation and validation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire.

Authors:  Caroline Silva; Gabriela Hurtado; Chelsey Hartley; José N Rangel; Joseph D Hovey; Jeremy W Pettit; Paloma Chorot; Rosa M Valiente; Bonifacio Sandín; Thomas E Joiner
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2018-10

3.  Is Team Emotional Composition Essential for Virtual Team Members' Well-Being? The Role of a Team Emotional Management Intervention.

Authors:  Nuria Gamero; Baltasar González-Anta; Virginia Orengo; Ana Zornoza; Vicente Peñarroja
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Group Positive Affect and Beyond: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Peñalver; Marisa Salanova; Isabel M Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let's learn from cows in the rain.

Authors:  Eric van Sonderen; Robbert Sanderman; James C Coyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the 'Happy-Productive Worker Thesis'.

Authors:  M Esther García-Buades; José M Peiró; María Isabel Montañez-Juan; Malgorzata W Kozusznik; Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Assessing acceptance in mindfulness with direct-worded items: The development and initial validation of the Athlete Mindfulness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Chun-Qing Zhang; Pak-Kwong Chung; Gangyan Si
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.