Literature DB >> 22279249

Neural correlates of covert and overt production of tense and agreement morphology: Evidence from fMRI.

Aneta Kielar1, Lisa Milman, Borna Bonakdarpour, Cynthia K Thompson.   

Abstract

Most neuroimaging studies examining verb morphology have focused on verb tense, with fewer examining agreement morphology, and no previous fMRI studies have investigated distinctions between past and present tense inflection. However, models of language representation and processing suggest differences in where these inflections are instantiated in the phrase structure as well as differences in the linguistic functions they serve, suggesting unique neural networks for these forms. In addition, results of available neuroimaging studies of grammatical morphology vary considerably due to methodological differences. Some studies have used overt production tasks, whereas others have used covert tasks. In the present study we examined brain activation associated with past tense and present tense/agreement morphology under overt and covert production conditions in 13 healthy adults using an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design. Production of verbs inflected for past tense (V + -ed) and present tense/agreement (V -s) was elicited using temporal adverbs (i.e. Yesterday, Nowadays). Results showed that in healthy adults inflecting both past tense and agreement morphology (compared to a verb stem production condition) recruited not only left inferior frontal structures, but also motor and premotor cortices, and posterior parietal regions. Activation also was observed in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and the cingulate gyrus. Past tense and present tense/agreement recruited partially overlapping tissue in these regions, with distinctions observed for the two forms in frontal and parietal brain areas. We also found that activation varied with task demands, with more extensive frontal activation noted in the overt compared to the covert verb inflection task. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the neural signatures for verb inflection differ from that for verb stems alone and involve a distributed frontal and parietal network of brain regions. Further, the neural tissue recruited for instantiation of past tense versus present tense/agreement morphology is distinct, supporting linguistic theories that differentiate the two forms.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22279249      PMCID: PMC3263466          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  65 in total

1.  The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study.

Authors:  D Perani; S F Cappa; T Schnur; M Tettamanti; S Collina; M M Rosa; F Fazio
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model.

Authors:  M F Joanisse; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms.

Authors:  Alan Beretta; Carrie Campbell; Thomas H Carr; Jie Huang; Lothar M Schmitt; Kiel Christianson; Yue Cao
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing.

Authors:  Susan Bookheimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

6.  Tense and agreement in German agrammatism.

Authors:  Michaela Wenzlaff; Harald Clahsen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Tense and Agreement dissociations in German agrammatic speakers: underspecification vs. hierarchy.

Authors:  Frank Burchert; Maria Swoboda-Moll; Ria De Bleser
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Tense and syntactic processes in agrammatic speech.

Authors:  Marina Arabatzi; Susan Edwards
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area.

Authors:  Ned T Sahin; Steven Pinker; Sydney S Cash; Donald Schomer; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

1.  Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases: The case of English agrammatism.

Authors:  Honglei Wang; Masaya Yoshida; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  The Study of Language in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - Frontotemporal Spectrum Disorder: a Systematic Review of Findings and New Perspectives.

Authors:  Marta Pinto-Grau; Orla Hardiman; Niall Pender
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Grammatical Impairments in PPA.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Jennifer E Mack
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 4.  Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: consensus and practical guidelines for data analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Meinzer; Pélagie M Beeson; Stefano Cappa; Jenny Crinion; Swathi Kiran; Dorothee Saur; Todd Parrish; Bruce Crosson; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Quantifying grammatical impairments in primary progressive aphasia: Structured language tests and narrative language production.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Elena Barbieri; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Intra-cranial recordings of brain activity during language production.

Authors:  Anaïs Llorens; Agnès Trébuchon; Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-27

7.  Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?

Authors:  Vânia de Aguiar; Roelien Bastiaanse; Rita Capasso; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Nicola Smania; Giorgio Rossi; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  The neural correlates of agrammatism: Evidence from aphasic and healthy speakers performing an overt picture description task.

Authors:  Eva Schönberger; Stefan Heim; Elisabeth Meffert; Peter Pieperhoff; Patricia da Costa Avelar; Walter Huber; Ferdinand Binkofski; Marion Grande
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-21

9.  Mapping typical and hypokinetic dysarthric speech production network using a connected speech paradigm in functional MRI.

Authors:  Shalini Narayana; Megan B Parsons; Wei Zhang; Crystal Franklin; Katherine Schiller; Asim F Choudhri; Peter T Fox; Mark S LeDoux; Michael Cannito
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Modularity and granularity across the language network-A primary progressive aphasia perspective.

Authors:  M-Marsel Mesulam; Christina A Coventry; Benjamin M Rader; Alan Kuang; Jaiashre Sridhar; Adam Martersteck; Hui Zhang; Cynthia K Thompson; Sandra Weintraub; Emily J Rogalski
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.