Literature DB >> 16156179

Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch plural nouns.

Rachèl J J K Kemps1, Mirjam Ernestus, Robert Schreuder, R Harald Baayen.   

Abstract

It has recently been shown that listeners use systematic differences in vowel length and intonation to resolve ambiguities between onset-matched simple words (Davis, Marslen-Wilson, & Gaskell, 2002; Salverda, Dahan, & McQueen, 2003). The present study shows that listeners also use prosodic information in the speech signal to optimize morphological processing. The precise acoustic realization of the stem provides crucial information to the listener about the morphological context in which the stem appears and attenuates the competition between stored inflectional variants. We argue that listeners are able to make use of prosodic information, even though the speech signal is highly variable within and between speakers, by virtue of the relative invariance of the duration of the onset. This provides listeners with a baseline against which the durational cues in a vowel and a coda can be evaluated. Furthermore, our experiments provide evidence for item-specific prosodic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156179     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language.

Authors:  R Bertram; M Laine; R Harald Baayen; R Schreuder; J Hyönä
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-02-14

2.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; James M McQueen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-11

3.  The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.

Authors:  A Lahiri; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-03

4.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.

Authors:  R F Lorch; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; H E Moss; S van Halen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Processing of English inflectional morphology.

Authors:  J A Sereno; A Jongman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

7.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; P A Luce
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Frequency effects in compound production.

Authors:  Heidrun Bien; Willem J M Levelt; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty-Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing.

Authors:  Fabian Tomaschek; Michael Ramscar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  How the Probabilistic Structure of Grammatical Context Shapes Speech.

Authors:  Maja Linke; Michael Ramscar
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  The processing of pseudoword form and meaning in production and comprehension: A computational modeling approach using linear discriminative learning.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Chuang; Marie Lenka Vollmer; Elnaz Shafaei-Bajestan; Susanne Gahl; Peter Hendrix; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.