Literature DB >> 14596329

The visual sort and rate method for perceptual evaluation in listening tests.

Svante Granqvist1.   

Abstract

This paper introduces the Visual Sort and Rate (VSR) method which can be utilized for perceptual rating of sound stimuli. The method facilitates comparing similar stimuli, thus making the rank ordering of the stimuli easier. To examine the potential benefits of the method, it was compared with two other methods for perceptual rating of audio stimuli. The first method was a straightforward computer-based implementation of a visual analogue scale (VAS) allowing multiple playbacks and re-play of previously heard stimuli (C-VAS). The second method utilized a VAS where the responses were given on paper (P-VAS). The three methods were compared by using two sets of stimuli. The first set was a synthetically generated series of stimuli mimicking the vowel /a/ with different spectral tilts. In this test, a single parameter was rated. The second set of stimuli was a naturally spoken voice. For this set of stimuli three parameters were rated. Results show that the VSR method gave better reliability of the subjects' ratings in the single-parameter tests: Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were significantly higher for the VSR method than for the other methods. For the multi-parameter, intra-subject test, significantly higher Pearson correlation coefficients were found for the VSR method than for the VAS on paper.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14596329     DOI: 10.1080/14015430310015255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol        ISSN: 1401-5439            Impact factor:   1.487


  18 in total

1.  Structural sensing of interior sound for active control of noise in structural-acoustic cavities.

Authors:  Ashok K Bagha; S V Modak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual evaluation of voice source models.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek; Gang Chen; Abeer Alwan; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic and perceptual effects of changes in body layer stiffness in symmetric and asymmetric vocal fold models.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt; Marc Garellek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparing Measures of Voice Quality From Sustained Phonation and Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Listener Perception of Monopitch, Naturalness, and Intelligibility for Speakers With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Supraja Anand; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Gabrielle L Hands; Carolyn R Calabrese; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Perceptual consequences of changes in epilaryngeal area and shape.

Authors:  Robin A Samlan; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Predicting and influencing voice therapy adherence using social-cognitive factors and mobile video.

Authors:  Eva van Leer; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Impact of Vocal Tract Resonance on the Perception of Voice Quality Changes Caused by Varying Vocal Fold Stiffness.

Authors:  Rosario Signorello; Zhaoyan Zhang; Bruce Gerratt; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.