Literature DB >> 14594691

Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.

Mohamed Abdel-Khalek1, Khaled Sheir, Emad Elsobky, Saied Showkey, Mahmoud Kenawy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define factors that have a significant impact on the stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of ureteric stones using multivariate analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 1992 and February 2002, a total of 938 patients with ureteric stones were treated with in situ ESWL using the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotripter. The outcome of treatment was evaluated after 3 months and failure was defined as the presence of any residual stones. The stone-free rate was correlated with patient characteristics (age, sex and radiological renal picture) and stone features (site, side, length, width, nature, opacity and the presence of ureteral stents). Factors with a significant impact on the stone-free rate using the chi (2) test were further analyzed using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, the stone-free rate was 88.7%. Repeat treatment was required in 50.4% of cases. Post-ESWL complications were observed in 32 cases (3.4%), including static steinstrasse in 19 (2%). Auxiliary procedures were needed in 28 cases (3%). Using the chi (2) test, only three factors had a significant impact on the stone-free rate, namely stone site, the transverse diameter of the stone and the presence of a ureteral stent. The stone-free rate was highest for stones located in the lumbar ureter (436/470; 92.8%) and lowest for those located in the pelvic ureter (268/324; 82.7%) (p = 0.0017). Stones with a transverse diameter of < or =1 cm were associated with a stone-free rate of 89.7% (715/797), compared to 83% (114/141) for those with a transverse diameter of >1 cm (p = 0.017). Non-stented patients had a stone-free rate of 89.8% (732/815), compared to 81.3% (100/123) for stented patients (p = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, these three factors maintained their statistical significance. A logistic regression model was designed to estimate the probability of stone-free status after ESWL.
CONCLUSION: The site and transverse diameter of the stone and the presence of a ureteral stent are the only significant predictors of success of ESWL therapy for ureteric stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14594691     DOI: 10.1080/00365590310006255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  18 in total

1.  Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Nikolaos Polimeros; Adamantios Kavouras; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

4.  Age-related delay in urinary stone clearance in elderly patients with solitary proximal ureteral calculi treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osamu Ichiyanagi; Akira Nagaoka; Takuji Izumi; Yuko Kawamura; Tomoyuki Kato
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Muwafak Salman; Abdulla A Al-Ansari; Raidh A Talib; El-Fadil El-Malik; Issam A Al-Bozaom; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.

Authors:  Burak Turna; Kaan Akbay; Fatih Ekren; Oktay Nazli; Erdal Apaydin; Bülent Semerci; Gürhan Günaydin; Ibrahim Cüreklibatir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Perforation of the upper ureter: a rare complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mehmet Turgut; Cavit Can; Aydin Yenilmez; Nevbahar Akcar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-05-31

8.  Predictive factors of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ji Woong Choi; Phil Hyun Song; Hyun Tae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19

9.  The efficacy of tamsulosin therapy after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: A prospective randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Hassan Ismail Mohamed
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-29

10.  Double J stent reduces the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lumbar ureteral stones.

Authors:  Caroline Pettenati; Amine Benchikh El Fegoun; Vincent Hupertan; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2013-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.