Literature DB >> 14593450

The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden.

J A Kanis1, O Johnell, A Oden, F Borgstrom, N Zethraeus, C De Laet, B Jonsson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the risk and burden of vertebral fractures judged as those coming to clinical attention and as morphometric fractures. Incidence and utility loss were computed from data from Malmo, Sweden. Clinical fractures accounted for 23% of all vertebral deformities in women and for 42% in men. The average 10-year fracture probability for morphometric fractures increased with age in men from 2.9% at the age of 50 years (7.2% in women) to 8.4 at the age of 85 years (26.7% in women). As expected, probabilities increased with decreasing T-score for hip BMD. Cumulative utility loss from a clinical vertebral fracture was substantial and was 50-62% of that due to a hip fracture depending on age. When incidence of fractures in the population was weighted by disutility, all spine fractures accounted for more morbidity than hip fracture up to the age of 75 years. We conclude that vertebral fractures have a major personal and societal impact that needs to be recognised in algorithms for assessment of risk and in health economic strategies for osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14593450     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1463-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes.

Authors:  B Jonsson; J Kanis; A Dawson; A Oden; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Preference for fractures and other glucocorticoid-associated adverse effects among rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  L A Merlino; I Bagchi; T N Taylor; P Utrie; E Chrischilles; W Sumner; A Mudano; K G Saag
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Bone density variation and its effects on risk of vertebral deformity in men and women studied in thirteen European centers: the EVOS Study.

Authors:  M Lunt; D Felsenberg; J Reeve; L Benevolenskaya; J Cannata; J Dequeker; C Dodenhof; J A Falch; P Masaryk; H A Pols; G Poor; D M Reid; C Scheidt-Nave; K Weber; J Varlow; J A Kanis; T W O'Neill; A J Silman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Colles' fracture of the wrist as an indicator of underlying osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a prospective study of bone mineral density and bone turnover rate.

Authors:  S A Earnshaw; S A Cawte; A Worley; D J Hosking
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Marjolein Van der Klift; Chris E D H De Laet; Eugene V McCloskey; Albert Hofman; Huibert A P Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  90 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Recommendations for preventing fracture in long-term care.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Nancy Santesso; Suzanne N Morin; Sidney Feldman; Jonathan D Adachi; Richard Crilly; Lora M Giangregorio; Susan Jaglal; Robert G Josse; Sharon Kaasalainen; Paul Katz; Andrea Moser; Laura Pickard; Hope Weiler; Susan Whiting; Carly J Skidmore; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Incorporating quality of evidence into decision analytic modeling.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  [Antiosteoporosis medication: useful monitoring, and how long should such treatment be continued?].

Authors:  W Demary
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Spain: analysis of the national hospital discharge registry.

Authors:  C Bouza; T López; M Palma; J M Amate
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Cost effectiveness of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; David Sykes; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Health state utility values and patient-reported outcomes before and after vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in an osteoporosis clinical trial.

Authors:  T Imai; S Tanaka; K Kawakami; T Miyazaki; H Hagino; M Shiraki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Lateral back pain identifies prevalent vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women: cross-sectional analysis of a primary care-based cohort.

Authors:  Emma M Clark; Alison P Hutchinson; Eugene V McCloskey; Mike D Stone; James C Martin; Ashok K Bhalla; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.