Literature DB >> 14589270

Techniques in cervical laminoplasty.

Chetan K Patel1, Benjamin J Cunningham, Harry N Herkowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Laminoplasty provides an alternative to anterior procedures or multilevel laminectomy for patients with multilevel spinal stenosis and myeloradiculopathy.
PURPOSE: To review the techniques, results and complications of cervical laminoplasty. STUDY
DESIGN: The three basic variations of laminoplasty are the single open door, the French door or midline and the Z-plasty technique. These techniques and their outcome are discussed in detail.
RESULTS: The recovery rate after laminoplasty ranges from 50% to 70% without statistical superiority of any one technique over another. Closure of opened laminae, temporary nerve root deficit, decreased neck range of motion and axial pain are the main complications of laminoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Good to excellent long-term clinical results can be expected for the appropriately selected patients regardless of the specific technique used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14589270     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00158-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  9 in total

1.  Laminoplasty using Twinfix suture anchors to maintain cervical canal expansion.

Authors:  Hai-Long Yu; Liang-Bi Xiang; Jun Liu; Yu Chen; Ming Yu; Yan Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Relationship between the laminoplasty opening size and the laminoplasty opening angle, increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following open-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhenfang Gu; Aili Zhang; Yong Shen; Feng Li; Xianze Sun; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhen-Fang Gu; Ai-Li Zhang; Yong Shen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Feng Li; Xian-Ze Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Laminar closure rates in patients with cervical myelopathies treated with either open-door laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous processes and extensor musculature or Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamane; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Shinya Arataki; Tomoyuki Takigawa; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Modified Open-door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers and Miniplates.

Authors:  Sung-Won Jin; Se-Hoon Kim; Bum-Joon Kim; Jong-Il Choi; Sung-Kon Ha; Sang-Dae Kim; Dong-Jun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  A Comparison of Implants Used in Double Door Laminoplasty : Allogeneic Bone Spacer versus Hydroxyapatite Spacer.

Authors:  Dong Yoon Lee; Chang Kyu Lee; In-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-10-24

7.  Relationship of actual laminoplasty opening size and increment of the cross-sectional area based on single-door cervical laminoplasy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Rui-Jun Tian; Xing Su; Shan-Bo Hu; Wei Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Open-Door Laminoplasty Using Lateral Mass Anchoring Screws and Nonabsorbable Sutures in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Cha; Han Wook Kim; Doo Guen Yang; Hee-Yoon Chung; Il-Yeong Hwang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-07-13

9.  Modified Laminoplasty for Degenerative Cervical Spondylosis: The Technique of Floating Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Samuel C Ohaegbulam; Wilfred C Mezue; Chika Anele Ndubuisi; Mark O Chikani; Ndubuisi D Achebe; Uwadiegwu A Erechukwu
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.