| Literature DB >> 1458587 |
R R Little1, H M Wiedmeyer, J D England, A L Wilke, C L Rohlfing, F H Wians, J M Jacobson, V Zellmer, D E Goldstein.
Abstract
The diversity of methods used to measure glycohemoglobins (GHb) makes it difficult to compare patients' results among laboratories. We reported previously the feasibility of providing comparable results from different assays by use of common calibrators. We here compare results from seven different GHb methods calibrated by use of hemolysates assayed by a precise ion-exchange high-performance liquid-chromatographic (HPLC) method for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Thus, regardless of the GHb species measured by the seven methods, results were referenced to the HbA1c content of the calibrators. Without this calibration, GHb values for single samples varied, e.g., from 4.0% to 8.1% and from 10% to 14.2% in the normal and high ranges, respectively. Calibration decreased between-method variability (single sample ranges of, e.g., 4.8% to 5.4% and 9.4% to 10.2% in the normal and high ranges, respectively) and improved interassay precision. We conclude that this approach to calibration of GHb measurements allows direct comparison of results obtained by different methods and improves precision.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 1992 PMID： 1458587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Chem ISSN： 0009-9147 Impact factor: 8.327