Literature DB >> 14580395

Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), TaqMan Salmonella, and Transia Card Salmonella assays for detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally-contaminated ground chicken, ground turkey, and ground beef.

Pina M Fratamico1.   

Abstract

Four types of assays were evaluated for the detection of Salmonella spp. in retail ground chicken (86 packages), ground turkey (104 packages), and ground beef (54 packages). Two 25 g samples from each package were separately subjected to pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water for 20 h at 37 degrees C followed by enrichment in Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broth for 20 h at 42 degrees C. The RV enrichments were plated onto Rambach agar, Rainbow Agar Salmonella, and XLT4 agar, and were also tested by a PCR assay targeting the Salmonella invA gene, as well as by the TaqMan Salmonella PCR assay. Additionally, the RV enrichments were tested using the Transia Card Salmonella immunoassay. Results showed that 16.8, 24.0, 28.8, and 26.4% of turkey samples were positive for Salmonella spp. by culture, PCR, TaqMan PCR, and Transia Card Salmonella assays, respectively. Eighteen, 28.5, 35.5, and 34.9% of chicken samples were positive by culture, PCR, TaqMan PCR, and Transia Card Salmonella assays, respectively, and 6.5, 6.5, 6.5, and 18.5% of ground beef samples were positive by the four assays, respectively. Analysis of the data using the kappa statistic showed that there was substantial to excellent agreement between the PCR and TaqMan PCR assays and between the PCR and culture assays (kappa coefficients ranging from 0.67 to 0.87), while there was poor to fair agreement between the results of the Transia Card Salmonella assay and the other methods (kappa coefficients ranging from 0.28 to 0.32). Overall, results showed that the PCR-based assays were more sensitive than the culture method, and the culture and PCR-based assays were more specific than the immunoassay for detection of Salmonella in ground chicken, turkey, and beef due to the occurrence of false positive results using the immunoassay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580395     DOI: 10.1016/s0890-8508(03)00056-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Probes        ISSN: 0890-8508            Impact factor:   2.365


  10 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization method using a peptide nucleic acid probe for identification of Salmonella spp. in a broad spectrum of samples.

Authors:  C Almeida; N F Azevedo; R M Fernandes; C W Keevil; M J Vieira
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Potentials and limitations of molecular diagnostic methods in food safety.

Authors:  Andrea Lauri; Paola O Mariani
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Accuracy and sensitivity of commercial PCR-based methods for detection of Salmonella enterica in feed.

Authors:  Sevinc Koyuncu; M Gunnar Andersson; Per Häggblom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Detection of Salmonella spp, Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium in naturally infected broiler chickens by a multiplex PCR-based assay.

Authors:  F G Paião; L G A Arisitides; L S Murate; G T Vilas-Bôas; L A Vilas-Boas; M Shimokomaki
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Multiplex, Rapid, and Sensitive Isothermal Detection of Nucleic-Acid Sequence by Endonuclease Restriction-Mediated Real-Time Multiple Cross Displacement Amplification.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Yan Wang; Lu Zhang; Dongxin Liu; Lijuan Luo; Hua Li; Xiaolong Cao; Kai Liu; Jianguo Xu; Changyun Ye
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Screening and Detecting Salmonella in Different Food Matrices in Southern Tunisia Using a Combined Enrichment/Real-Time PCR Method: Correlation with Conventional Culture Method.

Authors:  Mariam Siala; Amina Barbana; Salma Smaoui; Salma Hachicha; Chema Marouane; Sana Kammoun; Radhouane Gdoura; Férièle Messadi-Akrout
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Detection Methodologies for Pathogen and Toxins: A Review.

Authors:  Md Eshrat E Alahi; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Rapid Waterborne Pathogen Detection with Mobile Electronics.

Authors:  Tsung-Feng Wu; Yu-Chen Chen; Wei-Chung Wang; Ashwini S Kucknoor; Che-Jen Lin; Yu-Hwa Lo; Chun-Wei Yao; Ian Lian
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Molecular identification and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella species isolated from chickens in eastern Turkey.

Authors:  Aydogan Arkali; Burhan Çetinkaya
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Organic acids for control of Salmonella in different feed materials.

Authors:  Sevinc Koyuncu; Mats Gunnar Andersson; Charlotta Löfström; Panagiotis N Skandamis; Antonia Gounadaki; Jürgen Zentek; Per Häggblom
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.