Literature DB >> 20228106

Accuracy and sensitivity of commercial PCR-based methods for detection of Salmonella enterica in feed.

Sevinc Koyuncu1, M Gunnar Andersson, Per Häggblom.   

Abstract

The present study compared the performance of commercial PCR-based Salmonella enterica detection methods (BAX System Q7, the iQ-Check Salmonella II kit, and the TaqMan Salmonella enterica detection kit) with culture-based methods (modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis [MSRV] and NMKL71) in spiked and naturally contaminated samples of feed mill scrapings (FMS), palm kernel meal (PKM), pelleted feed (PF), rape seed meal (RSM), soybean meal (SM), and wheat grain (WG). When results from the various feeds were compared, the number of Salmonella enterica CFU/25 g required to produce a positive were as follows: PKM > FMS = WG > RSM = SM = PF. These data are similar to those developed in earlier studies with culture-based Salmonella detection methods. PCR-based methods were performed similarly to culture-based methods, with respect to sensitivity and specificity. However, many PCR positives could not be confirmed by Salmonella isolation and for that reason the evaluated methods were found to be suitable only when rapid results were paramount. Nevertheless, PCR-based methods cannot presently replace culture-based methods when typing information is required for tracing studies or epidemiological investigations. The observed difference in detection levels is a potential problem when prevalence data are compared as well as when feed ingredients are tested for conformance with microbiological criteria. This paper also presents a statistical model that describes the detection probability when different levels (CFU) of Salmonella contamination are present in feed materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20228106      PMCID: PMC2863422          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02714-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of TaqMan Salmonella amplification/detection kit with standard culture procedure for detection of Salmonella in meat samples.

Authors:  S Kawasaki; B Kimura; T Fujii
Journal:  Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.464

2.  Application of a molecular beacon-real-time PCR technology to detect Salmonella species contaminating fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  Samantha Hu Liming; Arvind A Bhagwat
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Evaluation of the BAX system for detection of Salmonella in selected foods: collaborative study.

Authors:  Karen Silbernagel; Robert Jechorek; Charles Carver; W Mark Barbour; Peter Mrozinski
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.913

Review 4.  An epidemiologic critique of current microbial risk assessment practices: the importance of prevalence and test accuracy data.

Authors:  Ian A Gardner
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Transmission of Salmonella mbandaka to cattle from contaminated feed.

Authors:  P W Jones; P Collins; G T Brown; M Aitken
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1982-04

6.  The susceptibility of chicks to Salmonella montevideo in artificially contaminated poultry feed.

Authors:  J H Schleifer; B J Juven; C W Beard; N A Cox
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.577

7.  Salmonella types isolated from the gulf of Aarhus compared with types from infected human beings, animals, and feed products in Denmark.

Authors:  K Grunnet; B B Nielsen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-12

8.  Detection of Salmonella from chicken rinses and chicken hot dogs with the automated BAX PCR system.

Authors:  J S Bailey; D E Cosby
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), TaqMan Salmonella, and Transia Card Salmonella assays for detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally-contaminated ground chicken, ground turkey, and ground beef.

Authors:  Pina M Fratamico
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonella in feed and feed ingredients.

Authors:  Sevinc Koyuncu; Per Haggblom
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  8 in total

1.  Lag phase of Salmonella enterica under osmotic stress conditions.

Authors:  K Zhou; S M George; A Métris; P L Li; J Baranyi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  First detection and characterization of Salmonella spp. in poultry and swine raised in backyard production systems in central Chile.

Authors:  R Alegria-Moran; D Rivera; V Toledo; A I Moreno-Switt; C Hamilton-West
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Estimation of costs for control of Salmonella in high-risk feed materials and compound feed.

Authors:  Martin Wierup; Stig Widell
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-12

4.  Detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens from individual filth flies.

Authors:  Monica Pava-Ripoll; Rachel E G Pearson; Amy K Miller; George C Ziobro
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Rapid, Sensitive, and Selective Quantification of Bacillus cereus Spores Using xMAP Technology.

Authors:  Houman Moteshareie; Walid M Hassen; Yasmine Dirieh; Emma Groulx; Jan J Dubowski; Azam F Tayabali
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  A Combination of Novel Nucleic Acid Cross-Linking Dye and Recombinase-Aided Amplification for the Rapid Detection of Viable Salmonella in Milk.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Feng; Donggen Zhou; Bei Gan; Guoyang Xie; Hengyi Xu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-08

7.  Epidemiological Study on Salmonella Prevalence in Sow Herds Using Direct and Indirect Detection Methods.

Authors:  Isabell Hollmann; Jan Berend Lingens; Volker Wilke; Christian Homann; Klaus Teich; Juhle Buch; Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-28

8.  Promoter activity dynamics in the lag phase of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Daniel Madar; Erez Dekel; Anat Bren; Anat Zimmer; Ziv Porat; Uri Alon
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-12-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.