Literature DB >> 14579135

Mobility provocation radiostereometry in anterior cervical spine fusions.

Björn Zoëga1, Johan Kärrholm, Bengt Lind.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the use of mobility-provocation radiostereometry (RSA) in anterior cervical spine fusions and compare the results to deformation studies on the same patients and plain flexion-extension radiographs. Mobility-provocation RSA was used to evaluate anterior cervical spine fusions in 45 patients. The motions recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to RSA measurements of deformation of the fusion over time and to plain flexion-extension radiographs in the same patients taken 3 months postoperatively. Studies of rotations from right to left revealed ten cases with significant motion at 3 months, and three at 12 months. With motion from flexion to extension, ten cases showed significant motion at 3 months and three at 12 months. In only three cases was the mobility-provocation RSA considered to add any information on the stability of the fusions compared to that obtained with the deformation studies. In 37 patients mobility-provocation radiography in flexion-extension using conventional technique was done to evaluate the accuracy. The mean difference between angular motions recorded on plain radiographs and rotations around the transverse axis in flexion to extension recorded with RSA was 1.6 degrees (range 0.04 degrees-8.04 degrees, SD 2.1 degrees). The corresponding 95% and 99% confidence limits for the difference between the two methods were 5.8 degrees and 7.2 degrees. The study showed that the use of mobility-provocation RSA did not add any information over that obtained by deformation RSA studies. Conventional radiography is too inaccurate to measure inducible displacement in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579135      PMCID: PMC3467980          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-001-0362-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  NONPATHOLOGIC AND PATHOLOGIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE LOWER CERVICAL VERTEBRAE.

Authors:  L PENNING
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1964-05

Review 2.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system.

Authors:  G Selvik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

Review 3.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications.

Authors:  J Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1989-08

4.  An analysis of errors in kinematic parameters associated with in vivo functional radiographs.

Authors:  M Panjabi; D Chang; J Dvorák
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results.

Authors:  J Kärrholm; P Herberts; P Hultmark; H Malchau; B Nivbrant; J Thanner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles.

Authors:  B Drerup
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients.

Authors:  J C Cauthen; R E Kinard; J B Vogler; D E Jackson; O B DePaz; O L Hunter; L B Wasserburger; V M Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  One-level cervical spine fusion. A randomized study, with or without plate fixation, using radiostereometry in 27 patients.

Authors:  B Zoëga; J Kärrholm; B Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-08

9.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall; H Malchau
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients.

Authors:  H Malchau; J Kärrholm; Y X Wang; P Herberts
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Autograft versus interbody fusion cage without plate fixation in the cervical spine: a randomized clinical study using radiostereometry.

Authors:  Bengt I Lind; Björn Zoega; Hans Rosén
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  RSA in Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Sulaf Dawood; Klas Halldin; Brian Freeman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Håkan Löfgren; M Engquist; P Hoffmann; B Sigstedt; L Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A comparison of radiostereometric analysis and computed tomography for the assessment of lumbar spinal fusion in a sheep model.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Brian J C Freeman; Rob J Moore; Stuart Callary; Klas Halldin; Vikram David; William Maclaurin; Paul Tauro; Mark Schoenwaelder
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2013-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.