Literature DB >> 14579094

Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by gated single-photon emission tomography: comparison with Doppler echocardiography.

Tetsuhiro Yamano1, Tomoki Nakamura, Kenzo Sakamoto, Takato Hikosaka, Kan Zen, Takeshi Nakamura, Takahisa Sawada, Akihiro Azuma, Tsunehiko Nishimura, Masao Nakagawa.   

Abstract

Gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET) is not yet an established procedure for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. This study examined diastolic function derived from gated SPET in comparison with an established diagnostic tool, Doppler echocardiography. We examined 37 consecutive patients with normal sinus rhythm who underwent gated technetium-99m tetrofosmin SPET. A gated SPET program was used with a temporal resolution of 32 frames per R-R interval. We obtained the Doppler transmitral flow velocity waveform immediately before gated SPET image acquisition. Patients who showed a ratio of peak early transmitral flow velocity to atrial flow velocity (E/A) of >1 or whose R-R intervals differed by >5% between Doppler echocardiography and gated SPET were excluded from this investigation. We compared diastolic indices and presumed corresponding intervals in diastole using the two methods. The peak filling rate (PFR) derived from gated SPET correlated with the Doppler peak velocity of the early transmitral flow (E) wave ( r=0.65) and deceleration of the E wave ( r=0.71). The time to PFR and percent atrial contribution to LV filling from gated SPET correlated excellently with the Doppler LV isovolumic relaxation time ( r=0.93) and the E/A ratio ( r=-0.85), respectively. There was a significant linear correlation in all the intervals from the R wave to the presumed corresponding diastolic points. The point of PFR in gated SPET and the peak of the E wave in Doppler echocardiography generally coincided. The onset of filling in gated SPET tended to be closer to the second heart sound than the start of the E wave in Doppler echocardiography. We conclude that gated SPET permits the assessment of not only myocardial perfusion and LV systolic function but also diastolic function, although there may be some errors in detection of the precise beginning of LV filling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579094     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1303-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of left ventricular function by gated myocardial perfusion and gated blood-pool SPECT: can we use the same reference database?

Authors:  A K Paul; S Hasegawa; J Yoshioka; H Yamaguchi; E Tsujimura; T Nishimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Assessment of left ventricular relaxation by Doppler echocardiography. Comparison of isovolumic relaxation time and transmitral flow velocities with time constant of isovolumic relaxation.

Authors:  Y Myreng; O A Smiseth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  A practical guide to assessment of ventricular diastolic function using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  G I Cohen; J F Pietrolungo; J D Thomas; A L Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparison of pulsed Doppler echocardiography and radionuclide angiography in the assessment of left ventricular filling.

Authors:  A C Pearson; H Goodgold; A J Labovitz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Determination of parameters of left ventricular diastolic filling with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with cineangiography.

Authors:  R Rokey; L C Kuo; W A Zoghbi; M C Limacher; M A Quinones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Gated myocardial perfusion tomography for the assessment of left ventricular function and volumes: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  E Cwajg; J Cwajg; Z X He; W S Hwang; F Keng; S F Nagueh; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Effects of verapamil on left ventricular systolic function and diastolic filling in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  R O Bonow; D R Rosing; S L Bacharach; M V Green; K M Kent; L C Lipson; B J Maron; M B Leon; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparative analysis of Doppler echocardiographic and radionuclide angiographic techniques.

Authors:  P Spirito; B J Maron; R O Bonow
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study.

Authors:  C P Appleton; L K Hatle; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Usefulness of left ventricular diastolic function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging over invasive coronary flow reserve measurement for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Shinichi Nunoda; Kazunobu Shitakura; Kiyotaka Okajima; Yutaka Kubo; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Eiko Ueno; Kuniaki Otsuka
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in recipients of heart transplants.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Shinichi Nunoda; Kiyotaka Okajima; Kazunobu Shitakura; Akihiko Sekikawa; Yutaka Kubo; Kuniaki Otsuka; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Eiko Ueno
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.