Literature DB >> 24242647

Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

D L Nolte1, J R Mason, G Epple, E Aronov, D L Campbell.   

Abstract

Predator odors often repel prey species. In the present experiments, we investigated whether changes in the diet of a predator, the coyote (Canis latrans) would affect the repellency of its urine. Furthermore, because predator odors have a high sulfur content, reflecting large amounts of meat in the diet, we investigated the contribution of sulfurous odors to repellency. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that diet composition and sulfurous metabolites of meat digestion are important for the repellency of predator odors to potential prey.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24242647     DOI: 10.1007/BF02059876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

1.  Responses of free-ranging coyotes to lures and their modifications.

Authors:  R W Bullard; F J Turkowski; S R Kilburn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines.

Authors:  R K Swihart; J J Pignatello; M J Mattina
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend's voleMicrotus townsendii.

Authors:  M Merkens; A S Harestad; T P Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : I. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Structure-activity relationship of stress-inducing odorants in the rat.

Authors:  E Vernet-Maury; E H Polak; A Demael
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : II. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus).

Authors:  T P Sullivan; L O Nordstrom; D S Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Modifying Scent-Marking Behavior to Reduce Woodchuck Damage to Fruit Trees.

Authors:  Robert K Swihart
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Chemical Scent Constituents in the Urine of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) During the Winter Season.

Authors:  J W Jorgenson; M Novotny; M Carmack; G B Copland; S R Wilson; S Katona; W K Whitten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Feeding responses of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to volatile constituents of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) urine.

Authors:  T P Sullivan; D R Crump
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Coyote estrous urine volatiles.

Authors:  T H Schultz; R A Flath; D J Stern; T R Mon; R Teranishi; S M Kruse; B Butler; W E Howard
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  37 in total

1.  Dissecting the smell of fear from conspecific and heterospecific prey: investigating the processes that induce anti-predator defenses.

Authors:  Heather M Shaffery; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Parasite and predator risk assessment: nuanced use of olfactory cues.

Authors:  John G Sharp; Sarah Garnick; Mark A Elgar; Graeme Coulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effect of chemical signals from a predator (Felis catus) on the reproduction of Mus musculus.

Authors:  V V Voznessenskaya; T V Malanina
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-03

4.  Deer responses to repellent stimuli.

Authors:  Bruce A Kimball; Jimmy Taylor; Kelly R Perry; Christina Capelli
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Plant Secondary Metabolites as Rodent Repellents: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sabine C Hansen; Caroline Stolter; Christian Imholt; Jens Jacob
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Effect of conspecific and heterospecific feces on foraging and oviposition of two predatory ladybirds: role of fecal cues in predator avoidance.

Authors:  Basant K Agarwala; Hironori Yasuda; Yukie Kajita
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid areas with experimentally deployed dingo scents.

Authors:  Michael H Parsons; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mouse alarm pheromone shares structural similarity with predator scents.

Authors:  Julien Brechbühl; Fabian Moine; Magali Klaey; Monique Nenniger-Tosato; Nicolas Hurni; Frank Sporkert; Christian Giroud; Marie-Christine Broillet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Responses of beaver (Castor canadensis Kuhl) to predator chemicals.

Authors:  A Engelhart; D Müller-Schwarze
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  An evaluation of repellents to suppress browsing by possums.

Authors:  A D Woolhouse; D R Morgan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.