Literature DB >> 14574514

Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Tatsuo Torizuka1, Fumitoshi Nakamura, Toshihiko Kanno, Masami Futatsubashi, Etsuji Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Okada, Masahide Kobayashi, Yasuomi Ouchi.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the value of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the early assessment of therapy response in lymphoma patients. We studied 20 patients with pathologically proven lymphoma, including 17 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and three patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. All patients underwent whole-body FDG-PET imaging at baseline and after 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy. PET images were analysed visually and quantitatively by calculating the standardised uptake value (SUV). In each patient, we measured the SUV of the tumour demonstrating the highest FDG uptake at baseline study and the SUV of the same tumour after 1-2 cycles of therapy. The achievement of complete response was assessed on the basis of a combination of clinical findings and the results of conventional imaging modalities. Follow-up of progression-free survival (PFS) was obtained for the validation of PET data. Of the 20 patients, ten achieved complete remission at the completion of chemotherapy and the other ten did not respond to chemotherapy. Of the ten responders, four are still in remission (PFS 24-34 months) while the other six have relapsed (PFS 8-16 months). For the prediction of 24-month clinical outcome, visual analysis of PET after 1-2 cycles showed high sensitivity (87.5%) and accuracy (80%) but low specificity (50%). Comparison with the baseline SUVs revealed that the responders showed a significantly greater percent reduction in SUV after 1-2 cycles of therapy as compared with the non-responders (81.2%+/-9.5% vs 35.0%+/-20.2%, P<0.001). In addition, using 60% reduction as a cut-off value, the responders were clearly separated from the non-responders, with the exception of one non-responder. In conclusion, when performed early during chemotherapy, FDG-PET may be predictive of clinical outcome and allows differentiation of responders from non-responders in cases of aggressive lymphoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14574514     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1333-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  27 in total

1.  PET predicts prognosis after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Morton Coleman; John P Leonard; Ichiei Kuji; Holly Zoe; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  R I Fisher; E R Gaynor; S Dahlberg; M M Oken; T M Grogan; E M Mize; J H Glick; C A Coltman; T P Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Thoracic CT-scanning follow-up of residual mediastinal masses after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  F Thomas; J M Cosset; P Cherel; N Renaudy; P Carde; J D Piekarski
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging.

Authors:  G Jerusalem; Y Beguin; M F Fassotte; F Najjar; P Paulus; P Rigo; G Fillet
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  T Philip; C Guglielmi; A Hagenbeek; R Somers; H Van der Lelie; D Bron; P Sonneveld; C Gisselbrecht; J Y Cahn; J L Harousseau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effect of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET imaging on clinical staging and management of patients with malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  H Schöder; J Meta; C Yap; M Ariannejad; J Rao; M E Phelps; P E Valk; J Sayre; J Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Prospective multicenter trial for the response-adapted treatment of high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: updated results of the COP-BLAM/IMVP-16 protocol with randomized adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Engelhard; P Meusers; G Brittinger; N Brack; W Dornoff; W Enne; W Gassmann; H Gerhartz; M Hallek; J Heise
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Clinical relevance of gallium-67 scintigraphy in lymphoma before and after therapy.

Authors:  C Delcambre; O Reman; M Henry-Amar; A M Peny; M Macro; S Cheze; J Y Génot; A Tanguy; O Switsers; H L Van; J E Couëtte; M Leporrier; S Bardet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-02

9.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET.

Authors:  T Torizuka; N Tamaki; T Inokuma; Y Magata; S Sasayama; Y Yonekura; A Tanaka; Y Yamaoka; K Yamamoto; J Konishi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  21 in total

1.  Early treatment response evaluation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a pilot study comparing volumetric MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Pertovaara; Pasi Korkola; Ritva Järvenpää; Maija Rossi; Tiit Kööbi; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Personalized versus evidence-based medicine with PET-based imaging.

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Early FDG-PET response-adapted risk stratification and further therapeutic decision-making in lymphoma: will this replace the established prognostic indices and be the standard-of-care in clinical management?

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: SUV-based assessment.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Hai-Ning Zhen; Keisuke Miyake; Yuka Yamamaoto; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Takashi Tamiya
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  What is the best treatment for children with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma?

Authors:  Frank G Keller; Sharon M Castellino; James B Nachman
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  Early post transplant (F-18) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography does not predict outcome for patients undergoing auto-SCT in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  J Palmer; T Goggins; G Broadwater; N Chao; M Horwitz; A Beaven; K Sullivan; R E Coleman; D Rizzieri
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Early interim FDG PET/CT prediction of treatment response and prognosis in pediatric Hodgkin disease-added value of low-dose CT.

Authors:  Anat Ilivitzki; Lea Radan; Miriam Ben-Arush; Ora Israel; Ayelet Ben-Barak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography/computer tomography: challenge to conventional imaging modalities in evaluating primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET quantitative parameters help in predicting the response to radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Thomas Cazaentre; Franck Morschhauser; Maximilien Vermandel; Nacim Betrouni; Thierry Prangère; Marc Steinling; Damien Huglo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.