Literature DB >> 10397709

Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging.

G Jerusalem1, Y Beguin, M F Fassotte, F Najjar, P Paulus, P Rigo, G Fillet.   

Abstract

A residual mass after treatment of lymphoma is a clinical challenge, because it may represent vital tumor as well as tissue fibrosis. Metabolic imaging by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) offers the advantage of functional tissue characterization that is largely independent of morphologic criteria. We compared 18F-FDG PET to computed tomography (CT) in the posttreatment evaluation of 54 patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) or intermediate/high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Residual masses on CT were observed in 13 of 19 patients with HD and 11 of 35 patients with NHL. Five of 24 patients with residual masses on CT versus 1 of 30 patients without residual masses presented a positive 18F-FDG PET study. Relapse occurred in all 6 patients (100%) with a positive 18F-FDG PET, 5 of 19 patients (26%) with residual masses on CT but negative 18F-FDG PET, and 3 of 29 patients (10%) with negative CT scan and 18F-FDG PET studies (P </=.0001). We observed a higher relapse and death rate in patients with residual masses at CT compared with patients without residual masses at CT (progression-free survival at 1 year: 62 +/- 10 v 88 +/- 7%, P =. 0045; overall survival at 1 year: 77 +/- 5 v 95 +/- 5%, P =.0038). A positive 18F-FDG PET study was even more consistently associated with poorer survival: compared with patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET study, the 1-year progression-free survival was 0% versus 86% +/- 5% (P <.0001) and the 1-year overall survival was 50% +/- 20% versus 92% +/- 4% (P <.0001). The detection of vital tumor by 18F-FDG PET after the end of treatment has a higher predictive value for relapse than classical CT scan imaging (positive predictive value: 100% v 42%). This could help identify patients requiring intensification immediately after completion of chemotherapy. However, 18F-FDG PET mainly predicts for early progression but cannot exclude the presence of minimal residual disease, possibly leading to a later relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10397709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  87 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography and gallium metabolic imaging in lymphoma.

Authors:  B Coiffier
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Restaging with gallium scan identifies chemosensitive patients and predicts survival of poor-prognosis mediastinal Hodgkin's disease patients.

Authors:  I Ionescu; P Brice; D Simon; A Guermazi; T Leblanc; P Rousselot; D Gossot; V Meignin; C Gisselbrecht; J D Rain
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Assessment of response to therapy using conventional imaging.

Authors:  Sheila C Rankin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The evolving role of F-FDG PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Peter J Hosein; Izidore S Lossos
Journal:  European J Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2010-02

5.  My treatment approach to patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  James O Armitage
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Emerging non-transplant-based strategies in treating pediatric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Lia Gore; Tanya M Trippett
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients.

Authors:  Yusuke Kanemasa; Tatsu Shimoyama; Yuki Sasaki; Miho Tamura; Takeshi Sawada; Yasushi Omuro; Tsunekazu Hishima; Yoshiharu Maeda
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate.

Authors:  Emerson Y Chen; Vikram Raghunathan; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Gallium-67 scintigraphy: a cornerstone in functional imaging of lymphoma.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Ora Israel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.