Literature DB >> 22392067

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Sven Nebelung1, Gregor Deitmer, Rolf Gebing, Frank Reichwein, Wolfgang Nebelung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biodegradable transfemoral graft fixation devices used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have recently been reported to precociously lose structural integrity.
METHODS: This study investigated outcomes after ACL reconstruction using hamstring grafts and biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up. The condition of both graft and fixation device was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and related to clinical outcomes. In total, 85 patients on whom index ACL reconstructive surgery by means of a quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis graft and biodegradable transfemoral fixation was performed were included in the study.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients could be assessed by clinical and MRI examinations at a mean follow-up of 61 months (range, 52-69 months). Completely intact pins were found in 17 patients (29%), intact pins with delicate areas of resorption in 8 patients (14%), pin deformation in 5 patients (8%), pin fracture in 22 patients (37%) and pin migration in 3 patients (5%). In 40 patients (68%), pins had undergone degradation at the graft suspension point. Hamstring graft integrity and signal intensity scores were found to be significantly higher in patients with deformed, broken or dislocated pins as compared to patients with fully or mainly intact pins. Clinically, the mean side-to-side difference in anterior-posterior-laxity was 1.1 ± 1.6 mm, while Lysholm, IKDC and Tegner scores were 89 ± 11, 84 ± 14 and 4 (1-9). No statistically significant correlation was found between pin condition and clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Biodegradable fixation pins lose structural integrity in a way that suggests continuous loading of the pin/graft construct, thereby questioning osseous incorporation of the graft. This situation is clinically relevant in terms of improved graft condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392067     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1938-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties and vascularity of an anterior cruciate ligament graft can be predicted by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. A two-year study in sheep.

Authors:  A Weiler; G Peters; J Mäurer; F N Unterhauser; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Biomechanical properties of quadruple tendon and patellar tendon femoral fixation techniques.

Authors:  R Becker; D Voigt; C Stärke; M Heymann; G A Wilson; W Nebelung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Bone tunnel remodeling at the site of biodegradable interference screws used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Lajtai; G Schmiedhuber; F Unger; G Aitzetmüller; M Klein; I Noszian; E Orthner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Do broken cross-pins compromise stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons?

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Jung-Hoon Lee; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  The effect of different graft tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A van Kampen; A B Wymenga; H J van der Heide; H J Bakens
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chadwick C Prodromos; Yung S Han; Brett L Keller; Richelle J Bolyard
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biodegradable transfemoral fixation used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew J Cossey; Yegappan Kalairajah; Russell Morcom; Anthony J Spriggins
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Otero; L Hutcheson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Hamstring insertion site healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with symptomatic hardware or repeat rupture: a histologic study in 12 patients.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Jaffar Es-Sayeh; Dominique Heymann; Norbert Passuti; Serge Eloit; Eric Vaneenoge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.