Literature DB >> 14572490

Comparison of two test methods for the determination of sufficient antimicrobial activity of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs for hygienic hand disinfection.

G Kampf1, B Meyer, P Goroncy-Bermes.   

Abstract

In Europe, the antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs is determined with a quantitative suspension test (prEN 12054) and a test under practical conditions (EN 1500). Another test method has recently been published by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (DGHM) with four differences to the European system in the in vitro tests: additional qualitative suspension tests with product dilutions to the ineffective range; a selection of the most resistant Gram-negative test strains in the qualitative suspension test, which should be used adjacent to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the quantitative suspension test; a high organic load in the quantitative suspension tests (0.3% albumin and 0.3% sheep erythrocytes); and an aqueous control in the quantitative suspension test. According to DGHM, the in vitro tests should be followed by EN 1500. We have determined the antimicrobial efficacy of three commonly used alcohol-based hand rubs according to both methods. prEN 12054 was carried out without organic load. The qualitative suspension tests (DGHM) were carried out with P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus hirae and Candida albicans. The quantitative suspension test (DGHM) was carried out with product dilutions of 75%, 50% and 25%, and a high organic load using the following test organisms: P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis (one product only), S. aureus, E. hirae and C. albicans. All these suspension tests were carried out in quadruplicate with each product and exposure time. EN 1500 was carried out with 3 mL of each product and an application time of 30 s. All three products achieved the required bactericidal activity of prEN 12054 and the new DGHM method within 30 s, and were equally effective with the reference hand disinfection of EN 1500 within 30 s. In our study, the DGHM test method did not provide additional information for hand rubs which exhibit their bactericidal efficacy with 3 mL within 30 s (EN 1500).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572490     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00255-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnostic tools for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Julianna Kurlenda; Mariusz Grinholc
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Evaluation of two methods of determining the efficacies of two alcohol-based hand rubs for surgical hand antisepsis.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Christiane Ostermeyer; Peter Heeg; Daryl Paulson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influence of applied volume on efficacy of 3-minute surgical reference disinfection method prEN 12791.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Christiane Ostermeyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Does a preceding hand wash and drying time after surgical hand disinfection influence the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub?

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Günter Kampf; Philipp Kamp; Thomas Kohlmann; Axel Kramer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  A 1-minute hand wash does not impair the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub in two consecutive surgical hand disinfection procedures.

Authors:  G Kampf; C Ostermeyer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparison of the Activity of Alcohol-Based Handrubs Against Human Noroviruses Using the Fingerpad Method and Quantitative Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Pengbo Liu; David R Macinga; Marina L Fernandez; Carrie Zapka; Hui-Mien Hsiao; Brynn Berger; James W Arbogast; Christine L Moe
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidine-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Marc Shaffer; Corrine Hunte
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Wearing Occlusive Gloves Increases the Density of Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Hand Eczema.

Authors:  Line Brok Nørreslet; Sofie Marie Edslev; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Niels Erik Ebbehøj; Paal Skytt Andersen; Tove Agner
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.875

10.  Comprehensive bactericidal activity of an ethanol-based hand gel in 15 seconds.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Angela Hollingsworth
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.