Literature DB >> 18431675

Minimizing variability of cascade impaction measurements in inhalers and nebulizers.

Matthew Bonam1, David Christopher, David Cipolla, Brent Donovan, David Goodwin, Susan Holmes, Svetlana Lyapustina, Jolyon Mitchell, Steve Nichols, Gunilla Pettersson, Chris Quale, Nagaraja Rao, Dilraj Singh, Terrence Tougas, Mike Van Oort, Bernd Walther, Bruce Wyka.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to catalogue in a systematic way the available information about factors that may influence the outcome and variability of cascade impactor (CI) measurements of pharmaceutical aerosols for inhalation, such as those obtained from metered dose inhalers (MDIs), dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or products for nebulization; and to suggest ways to minimize the influence of such factors. To accomplish this task, the authors constructed a cause-and-effect Ishikawa diagram for a CI measurement and considered the influence of each root cause based on industry experience and thorough literature review. The results illustrate the intricate network of underlying causes of CI variability, with the potential for several multi-way statistical interactions. It was also found that significantly more quantitative information exists about impactor-related causes than about operator-derived influences, the contribution of drug assay methodology and product-related causes, suggesting a need for further research in those areas. The understanding and awareness of all these factors should aid in the development of optimized CI methods and appropriate quality control measures for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of pharmaceutical aerosols, in line with the current regulatory initiatives involving quality-by-design (QbD).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18431675      PMCID: PMC2976949          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-008-9045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  35 in total

1.  Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part I: Design.

Authors:  Virgil A Marple; Daryl L Roberts; Francisco J Romay; Nicholas C Miller; Keith G Truman; Michiel Van Oort; Bo Olsson; Michael J Holroyd; Jolyon P Mitchell; Dieter Hochrainer
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

2.  Considerations for the development and practice of cascade impaction testing, including a mass balance failure investigation tree.

Authors:  Dave Christopher; Paul Curry; Bill Doub; Kenneth Furnkranz; Martin Lavery; Karl Lin; Svetlana Lyapustina; Jolyon Mitchell; Brian Rogers; Helen Strickland; Terrence Tougas; Yi Tsong; Bruce Wyka
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

3.  Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part II: Archival calibration.

Authors:  Virgil A Marple; Bernard A Olson; Kumaragovindham Santhanakrishnan; Jolyon P Mitchell; Sharon C Murray; Buffy L Hudson-Curtis
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

Review 4.  Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols from medical inhalers: their uses and limitations.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Mark W Nagel
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

5.  Regarding the development and practice of cascade impaction testing, including a mass balance failure investigation tree.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

6.  Determination of nebulizer droplet size distribution: a method based on impactor refrigeration.

Authors:  Elna Berg; Jan Olof Svensson; Lars Asking
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2007

7.  Study of the hygroscopic properties of selected pharmaceutical aerosols using single particle levitation.

Authors:  C Peng; A H Chow; C K Chan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Aerodynamic particle size analysis of aerosols from pressurized metered-dose inhalers: comparison of Andersen 8-stage cascade impactor, next generation pharmaceutical impactor, and model 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer aerosol spectrometer.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Mark W Nagel; Kimberly J Wiersema; Cathy C Doyle
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Aerodynamic sizing of metered dose inhalers: an evaluation of the Andersen and Next Generation pharmaceutical impactors and their USP methods.

Authors:  Akihiko Kamiya; Masahiro Sakagami; Michael Hindle; Peter R Byron
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Sub-micrometer particle production by pressurized metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Mark Crampton; Rob Kinnersley; Jon Ayres
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2004
View more
  10 in total

1.  Measurement of drug in small particles from aqueous nasal sprays by Andersen Cascade Impactor.

Authors:  William H Doub; Wallace P Adams; Anna M Wokovich; John C Black; Meiyu Shen; Lucinda F Buhse
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Relative precision of inhaler aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) metrics by full resolution and abbreviated andersen cascade impactors (ACIs): part 1.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Mark W Nagel; Cathy C Doyle; Rubina S Ali; Valentina I Avvakoumova; J David Christopher; Jorge Quiroz; Helen Strickland; Terrence Tougas; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  The abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept: part 1--Influence of particle bounce and re-entrainment-evaluation with a "dry" pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)-based formulation.

Authors:  J P Mitchell; M W Nagel; V Avvakoumova; H MacKay; R Ali
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Non-impactor-based methods for sizing of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs).

Authors:  Jolyon Mitchell; Richard Bauer; Svetlana Lyapustina; Terrence Tougas; Volker Glaab
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Precision Ocular Drug Delivery Via Aerosol Ring Vortices.

Authors:  Matthew J Herpin; Hugh D C Smyth
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Effect of Inhalation Flow Rate on Mass-Based Plume Geometry of Commercially Available Suspension pMDIs.

Authors:  Daniel F Moraga-Espinoza; Eli Eshaghian; Albert Shaver; Hugh D C Smyth
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  The effect of nonideal cascade impactor stage collection efficiency curves on the interpretation of the size of inhaler-generated aerosols.

Authors:  D L Roberts; J P Mitchell
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 8.  Innovative preclinical models for pulmonary drug delivery research.

Authors:  Stephan Ehrmann; Otmar Schmid; Chantal Darquenne; Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser; Josue Sznitman; Lin Yang; Hana Barosova; Laurent Vecellio; Jolyon Mitchell; Nathalie Heuze-Vourc'h
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 6.648

9.  POxylated Dendrimer-Based Nano-in-Micro Dry Powder Formulations for Inhalation Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rita B Restani; Rita F Pires; Anna Tolmatcheva; Rita Cabral; Pedro V Baptista; Alexandra R Fernandes; Teresa Casimiro; Vasco D B Bonifácio; Ana Aguiar-Ricardo
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.911

10.  Experimental Evaluation of Dry Powder Inhalers during Inhalation and Exhalation Using a Model of the Human Respiratory System (xPULM™).

Authors:  Richard Pasteka; Lara Alina Schöllbauer; Joao Pedro Santos da Costa; Radim Kolar; Mathias Forjan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.