| Literature DB >> 14570165 |
William J Gehring1, Richard L Bryck, John Jonides, Roger L Albin, David Badre.
Abstract
In studies of mental counting, participants are faster to increment a count that was just incremented (no-switch trial) than to increment a different count (switch trial). Investigators have attributed the effect to a shift in the internal focus of attention on switch trials. Here we report evidence for other bottom-up and top-down contributions. Two stimuli were mapped to each of two counts. The no-switch facilitation was greater when stimuli repeated than when they were different. Event-related potential (ERP) activity associated with repetitions was anterior to that associated with switching. Runs of no-switch trials elicited faster responses and frontal ERP activity. Runs of switches and large counts both elicited slow responses and reduced P300 amplitudes. Bottom-up processes may include priming on no-switch trials and conflict on switch trials. Top-down processes may control conflict, subvocal rehearsal, and the contents of working memory.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 14570165 DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychophysiology ISSN: 0048-5772 Impact factor: 4.016