Literature DB >> 21264591

The distance effect in numerical memory-updating tasks.

Cristina Lendínez1, Santiago Pelegrina, Teresa Lechuga.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the role of numerical distance in updating numerical information in working memory. In the first experiment, participants had to memorize a new number only when it was smaller than a previously memorized number. In the second experiment, updating was based on an external signal, which removed the need to perform any numerical comparison. In both experiments, distance between the memorized number and the new one was manipulated. The results showed that smaller distances between the new and the old information led to shorter updating times. This graded facilitation suggests that the process by which information is substituted in the focus of attention involves maintaining the shared features between the new and the old number activated and selecting other new features to be activated. Thus, the updating cost may be related to amount of new features to be activated in the focus of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264591     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0047-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  31 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Keeping track of variables that have few or many states.

Authors:  D B YNTEMA; G E MUESER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-04

3.  Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks.

Authors:  Bert Reynvoet; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Cognitive arithmetic: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  M H Ashcraft
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

5.  Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall.

Authors:  Elke B Lange; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005 Apr-May

6.  Attention shift in human verbal working memory: priming contribution and dynamic brain activation.

Authors:  Zhihao Li; Min Bao; Xiangchuan Chen; Daren Zhang; Shihui Han; Sheng He; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

8.  Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.

Authors:  S Dehaene; E Dupoux; J Mehler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.

Authors:  R S Moyer; T K Landauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  How sublexical association strength modulates updating: Cognitive and strategic effects.

Authors:  Caterina Artuso; Paola Palladino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

2.  Training working memory updating in young adults.

Authors:  Rocío Linares; Erika Borella; M Teresa Lechuga; Barbara Carretti; Santiago Pelegrina
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Long-term memory effects on working memory updating development.

Authors:  Caterina Artuso; Paola Palladino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Nearest transfer effects of working memory training: A comparison of two programs focused on working memory updating.

Authors:  Rocío Linares; Erika Borella; Mª Teresa Lechuga; Barbara Carretti; Santiago Pelegrina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rob Udale; Simon Farrell; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.