Literature DB >> 313656

Binocular counterrolling in humans during dynamic rotation.

S G Diamond, C H Markham, N E Simpson, I S Curthoys.   

Abstract

Seven subjects 18 to 66 years old underwent 360 degrees rotation at a constant velocity of 3 degrees/sec, in 27 trials beginning randomly right ear down or left ear down. A camera on the rotating chair photographed both eyes every 10 degrees. Dual projectors measured counterrolling, the image from one projector being aligned and rotated until it was superimposed on the image from the other. Right and left eyes were measured independently. The group reached maximum counterrolling at about 70 degrees and 270 degrees in rotations to the right, with values of about -6 degrees and 4 degrees respectively. Rotations to the left reached maximum at 50 degrees and 270 degrees with about 4.5 degrees and -5.25 degrees respectively. Individual subjects showed ranges of counterrolling varying from 4.03 degrees to 17.44 degrees, mean 11.30 degrees. More counterrolling was observed when subjects were tilted to right than to left. The downward eye counterrolled more than the upward. Amount of counterrolling was inversely correlated with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 313656     DOI: 10.3109/00016487909126457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  19 in total

1.  Excitation of the extraocular muscles in decerebrate cats during the vestibulo-ocular reflex in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Baker; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Modern vestibular function testing.

Authors:  R W Baloh; J M Furman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-01

3.  Static ocular counterroll: video-based analysis after minimizing the false-torsion factors.

Authors:  Ichiro Hamasaki; Satoshi Hasebe; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Is there a three neuron arc in the cat utriculo-trochlear pathway?

Authors:  M Sasaki; K Hiranuma; N Isu; Y Uchino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 7. Ocular counterrolling measurements pre- and post-flight.

Authors:  H Vogel; J R Kass
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Neck muscle vibration alters visually perceived roll in normals.

Authors:  George J McKenna; Grace C Y Peng; David S Zee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.