Literature DB >> 20162024

Influence of extero- and proprioceptive afferents of the plantar surface in determining subjective visual vertical in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction.

M Faralli1, F Longari, G Ricci, M C Ibba, A Frenguelli.   

Abstract

Subjective visual vertical refers to an individual's ability to indicate what, in his or her opinion, is a perfectly vertical line in specific experimental conditions. Although the otolith organs play a key role in the perception of verticality, the contribution of other sensory systems, e.g. the visual and proprioceptive systems, cannot be overlooked. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that extero- and proprioceptive afferent signals, particularly from the plantar surface of the foot, can influence the temporal evolution of altered subjective visual vertical following unilateral acute vestibular dysfunction. Subjective visual vertical was studied in 40 consecutive patients: 19 females and 21 males (mean age 46.4 years). It was first measured at diagnosis (1-2 days after onset of symptoms). For this measurement, a baseline test was performed (patient standing in direct contact with the floor), followed by a provocation test with a soft support between the patient's feet and the floor. Based on a comparison between the baseline and provocation tests, the patients were divided into three groups: Group A--patients showing a significant increase (p < 0.05) in subjective visual vertical(0 )values in the provocation test compared to baseline values; Group B--patients showing a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in subjective visual vertical(0 )values in the provocation test compared to baseline values; Group C--patients showing no significant changes (p < 0.05) in subjective visual vertical(0 )values in the provocation test compared to baseline values. The baseline test was repeated at 30, 90 and 180 days. At the end of the follow-up, a persistent change in subjective visual vertical was noted in 87% of the patients from Group B, 31% of the patients from Group C but none of the patients from Group A, all of whom were able to correct the perception error during the second examination. The study demonstrates that normalisation of subjective visual vertical in subjects with unilateral vestibular lesions seems to be influenced by the possibility of exploiting extra-vestibular sensory information, particularly extero- and proprioceptive information from the plantar surface.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Otolith function; Proprioceptive afferents; Subjective visual vertical; Vestibular dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20162024      PMCID: PMC2821126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  13 in total

1.  [Vertical and/or horizontal subjective visual].

Authors:  P Vannucchi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.124

2.  Ocular tilt reaction with peripheral vestibular lesion.

Authors:  G M Halmagyi; M A Gresty; W P Gibson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  The judgement of the visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesions.

Authors:  G Friedmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in peripheral vestibular diseases.

Authors:  A Böhmer; J Rickenmann
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 5.  New tests of vestibular function.

Authors:  G M Halmagyi; J G Colebatch; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Neurol       Date:  1994-11

6.  Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function.

Authors:  S G Diamond; C H Markham
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Vibration-induced shift of the subjective visual horizontal: a sign of unilateral vestibular deficit.

Authors:  Mikael Karlberg; Swee T Aw; G Michael Halmagyi; Ross A Black
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-01

8.  Neck muscle vibration alters visually perceived roll in normals.

Authors:  George J McKenna; Grace C Y Peng; David S Zee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-16

9.  Determining subjective visual vertical: dynamic versus static testing.

Authors:  Mario Faralli; Giampietro Ricci; Egisto Molini; Fabrizio Longari; Guido Altissimi; Antonio Frenguelli
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Vestibular compensation: a review of the oculomotor, neural, and clinical consequences of unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  I S Curthoys; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  10 in total

1.  Residual dizziness after the first BPPV episode: role of otolithic function and of a delayed diagnosis.

Authors:  Mario Faralli; Ruggero Lapenna; Giorgia Giommetti; Cristina Pellegrino; Giampietro Ricci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A New Sensitive Test Using Virtual Reality and Foam to Probe Postural Control in Vestibular Patients: The Unilateral Schwannoma Model.

Authors:  Grâce Oussou; Christophe Magnani; Ioannis Bargiotas; Georges Lamas; Frederic Tankere; Catherine Vidal
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Perceptual-motor styles.

Authors:  Pierre-Paul Vidal; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Normative data for human postural vertical: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laila B Conceição; Jussara A O Baggio; Suleimy C Mazin; Dylan J Edwards; Taiza E G Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A new method to analyze the subjective visual vertical in patients with bilateral vestibular dysfunction.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Taiza Elaine Grespan Santos-Pontelli; José Fernando Colafêmina; Theo Zeferino Pavan; Antonio Adilton Oliveira Carneiro; Osvaldo Massaiti Takayanagui
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Plantar cutaneous afferents influence the perception of Subjective Visual Vertical in quiet stance.

Authors:  A Foisy; Z Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Different time course of compensation of subjective visual vertical and ocular torsion after acute unilateral vestibular lesion.

Authors:  Mario Faralli; Giampietro Ricci; Leonardo Manzari; Giulia Zambonini; Ruggero Lapenna; Vito Enrico Pettorossi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Changes in the Results of the Subjective Visual Vertical Test After Endolymphatic Sac Drainage for Intractable Meniere's Disease.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Shiozaki; Yoshiro Wada; Taeko Ito; Toshiaki Yamanaka; Tadashi Kitahara
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Subjective visual vertical with the bucket method in Brazilian healthy individuals.

Authors:  Maristela Mian Ferreira; Fabiana Cunha; Cristina Freitas Ganança; Maurício Malavasi Ganança; Heloisa Helena Caovilla
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-02

10.  Software for subjective visual vertical assessment: an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Theo Zeferino Pavan; Martha Funabashi; José Ailton Oliveira Carneiro; Taiza Elaine Grespan dos Santos Pontelli; Walfred Tedeschi; José Fernando Colafêmina; Antonio Adilton Olivera Carneiro
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.