Literature DB >> 14568626

Optimal choice of a cut point for a quantitative diagnostic test performed for research purposes.

Laurence S Magder1, Alan D Fix.   

Abstract

Often, in epidemiologic research, classification of study participants with respect to the presence of a dichotomous condition (e.g., infection) is based on whether a quantitative measurement exceeds a specified cut point. The choice of a cut point involves a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. When the classification is to be made for the purpose of estimating risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs), it might be argued that the best choice of cut point is one that maximizes the precision of estimates of the RRs or ORs. In this article, two different approaches for estimating RRs and ORs are discussed. For each approach, formulae are derived that give the mean squared error of the RR and OR estimates, for any choice of cut point. Based on these formulae, a cut point can be chosen that minimizes the mean squared error of the estimate of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14568626     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  3 in total

1.  Optimal partitioning for the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Usha Govindarajulu; Thaddeus Tarpey
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Hypertonic saline administration and complex traumatic brain injury outcomes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Rema J Malik; Gregory S Huang; Chander M Kohli; Brian P Brocker; Kene T Ugokwe
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-06-20

3.  Accuracy of a disability instrument to identify workers likely to develop upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Bert Stover; Barbara Silverstein; Thomas Wickizer; Diane P Martin; Joel Kaufman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-05-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.