Literature DB >> 17487573

Accuracy of a disability instrument to identify workers likely to develop upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Bert Stover1, Barbara Silverstein, Thomas Wickizer, Diane P Martin, Joel Kaufman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Work related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) result in substantial disability, and expense. Identifying workers or jobs with high risk can trigger intervention before workers are injured or the condition worsens.
METHODS: We investigated a disability instrument, the QuickDASH, as a workplace screening tool to identify workers at high risk of developing upper extremity MSDs. Subjects included workers reporting recurring upper extremity MSD symptoms in the past 7 days (n = 559).
RESULTS: The QuickDASH was reasonably accurate at baseline with sensitivity of 73% for MSD diagnosis, and 96% for symptom severity. Specificity was 56% for diagnosis, and 53% for symptom severity. At 1-year follow-up sensitivity and specificity for MSD diagnosis was 72% and 54%, respectively, as predicted by the baseline QuickDASH score. For symptom severity, sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 52%. An a priori target sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 50% was met by symptom severity, work pace and quality, and MSD diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The QuickDASH may be useful for identifying jobs or workers with increased risk for upper extremity MSDs. It may provide an efficient health surveillance screening tool useful for targeting early workplace intervention for prevention of upper extremity MSD problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17487573     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9083-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  41 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure.

Authors:  A M Davis; D E Beaton; P Hudak; P Amadio; C Bombardier; D Cole; G Hawker; J N Katz; M Makela; R G Marx; L Punnett; J G Wright
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; J N Katz; J G Wright; G Wells; M Boers; V Strand; B Shea
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  J K Sluiter; K M Rest; M H Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale.

Authors:  G Pransky; M Feuerstein; J Himmelstein; J N Katz; M Vickers-Lahti
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  J M Murphy; D M Berwick; M C Weinstein; J F Borus; S H Budman; G L Klerman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06

7.  An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination.

Authors:  K Ohlsson; R G Attewell; B Johnsson; A Ahlm; S Skerfving
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Ergonomic intervention: its effect on working posture and musculoskeletal symptoms in female biomedical scientists.

Authors:  N Kilroy; S Dockrell
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Classification criteria and severity assessment in work-associated upper extremity disorders: methods matter.

Authors:  J N Katz; S R Stock; B A Evanoff; D Rempel; J S Moore; A Franzblau; R H Gray
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; B R Josephy; C K Wells
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carol A Kennedy; Dorcas E Beaton; Peter Smith; Dwayne Van Eerd; Kenneth Tang; Taucha Inrig; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Denise Linton; Rachel Couban
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Functional Measures Developed for Clinical Populations Identified Impairment Among Active Workers with Upper Extremity Disorders.

Authors:  Bethany T Gardner; Ann Marie Dale; Skye Buckner-Petty; Robert Rachford; Jaime Strickland; Vicki Kaskutas; Bradley Evanoff
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-03

3.  The impact of endoscopic activity on musculoskeletal disorders of high-volume endoscopists in Germany.

Authors:  N Sturm; J Leukert; L Perkhofer; A Hann; M Wagner; B Mayer; T Seufferlein; J Mayerle; C Schulz; A Meining; E Kraft; Benjamin M Walter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.

Authors:  C Philip Gabel; Michael Yelland; Markus Melloh; Brendan Burkett
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.