Literature DB >> 14566446

Task-dependent motor learning.

Isaac Kurtzer1, Paul DiZio, James Lackner.   

Abstract

We examined whether task-dependent modulation was evident in a motor learning paradigm. Subjects performed reaching movements before, during, and after exposure to a novel force perturbation while adopting either a spatial goal, "continue towards the target", or an effort goal, "keep your effort profile the same". Before the perturbation, the hand trajectories were moderately straight and accurate regardless of the task. However, during and immediately after the perturbation, the reaches exhibited unambiguous task-dependent differences in both the initial and terminal periods of the reach. With the spatial goal, subjects showed terminal compensations to the force-induced displacements indicative of feedback control. In addition, feedforward control was evident in the smaller path deviations with continued exposure and the initial path aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. In contrast, when adopting an effort goal, subjects showed large and chronically deviated endpoints from the perturbation indicating an absence of feedback compensation. They also showed no feedforward adaptation during repeated exposure or visible aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. Therefore, both feedforward and feedback control mechanisms show task-dependent modulation in a motor learning paradigm.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566446     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1632-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Lack of conscious recognition of one's own actions in a haptically deafferented patient.

Authors:  Pierre Fourneret; Jacques Paillard; Yves Lamarre; Jonathan Cole; Marc Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks.

Authors:  R B Stein; C Capaday
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  'Fusimotor set': new evidence for alpha-independent control of gamma-motoneurones during movement in the awake cat.

Authors:  A Prochazka; M Hulliger; P Zangger; K Appenteng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Maintenance of constant arm position or force: reflex and volitional components in man.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort.

Authors:  P E Roland; H Ladegaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Muscular torque generation during imposed joint rotation: torque-angle relationships when subjects' only goal is to make a constant effort.

Authors:  P R Burgess; L F Jones; C F Buhler; J P A Dewald; L-Q Zhang; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  7 in total

1.  Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: a pilot study.

Authors:  Tina M Stoeckmann; Katherine J Sullivan; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-05-14

2.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.

Authors:  Nicolas X Leclere; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Yann Coello; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhou; Elizabeth A Kruse; Rylee Brower; Ryan North; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multiple processes independently predict motor learning.

Authors:  Christopher M Perry; Tarkeshwar Singh; Kayla G Springer; Adam T Harrison; Alexander C McLain; Troy M Herter
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.