Literature DB >> 6461386

The perception of motor commands or effort during muscular paralysis.

S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

An observation by Mach (1906) on the sense of effort during hemiplegia has been confirmed. Two patients, who became suddenly hemiplegic, without sensory symptoms, noted that attempts to move when first paralysed were not accompanied by a sense of effort, but that attempts to move when movement first returned were accompanied by distinct sensations of effort or heaviness. This absence of a sense of effort during upper motor neuron paralysis without sensory signs did not occur either in a group of patients with pure lower motor neuron paralysis or in patients with clinically complete spinal transection. Previous studies have suggested that signals of motor command or effort, which arise at levels rostral to spinal motoneurons, contribute to the estimation of weights and tensions (see McCloskey et al., 1974; Gandevia and McCloskey, 1977a). One interpretation of the return of a sensation of effort as hemiplegia progresses to paresis is that activity in corticofugal paths contributes to generation of the sense of effort. During complete hemiplegia there is no neural traffic in motor corticofugal paths below the internal capsule and a sense of effort is absent. But, during paresis, there is increased neural traffic in the uninterrupted corticofugal fibres and there is a strong sense of effort or heaviness. Alternatively, a subcortical structure with a critical ascending projection to motor cortical areas may co-operate in generation the sense of effort. Afferent information, while important for calibrating and scaling the sense of effort which usually signals force or weight, is not essential for generation of a crude signal of descending motor command or effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6461386     DOI: 10.1093/brain/105.1.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  29 in total

1.  Task-dependent motor learning.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Paul DiZio; James Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Heaviness perception. III. Weight/aperture in the discernment of heaviness in cubes haptically perceived by thumb-index finger grasp.

Authors:  Satoru Kawai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Changes in perceived finger force produced by muscular contractions under isometric and anisometric conditions.

Authors:  N Mai; P Schreiber; J Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Independent digit control: failure to partition perceived heaviness of weights lifted by digits of the human hand.

Authors:  S L Kilbreath; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Challenging the brain: Exploring the link between effort and cortical activation.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; T Hoque; R Mraz; B J Macintosh; S J Graham; S E Black; W R Staines; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Central command influences cardiorespiratory response to dynamic exercise in humans with unilateral weakness.

Authors:  J A Innes; S C De Cort; P J Evans; A Guz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effect of brain and spinal cord injuries on motor imagery.

Authors:  J Decety; D Boisson
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man.

Authors:  J Decety; M Jeannerod; D Durozard; G Baverel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Respiratory sensations, cardiovascular control, kinaesthesia and transcranial stimulation during paralysis in humans.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; K Killian; D K McKenzie; M Crawford; G M Allen; R B Gorman; J P Hales
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.