Literature DB >> 14566244

Computational fluid dynamics in the evaluation of hemodynamic performance of cavopulmonary connections after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Edward L Bove1, Marc R de Leval, Francesco Migliavacca, Gualtiero Guadagni, Gabriele Dubini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computational fluid dynamics have been used to study the hemodynamic performance of surgical operations, resulting in improved design. Efficient designs with minimal energy losses are especially important for cavopulmonary connections. The purpose of this study was to compare hydraulic performance between the hemi-Fontan and bidirectional Glenn procedures, as well as the various types of completion Fontan operations.
METHODS: Three-dimensional models were constructed of typical hemi-Fontan and bidirectional Glenn operations according to anatomic data derived from magnetic resonance scans, angiocardiograms, and echocardiograms. Boundary conditions were imposed, and fluid dynamics were calculated from a mathematic code. Power losses, flow distribution to each lung, and pressures were measured at three predetermined levels of pulmonary arteriolar resistance. Models of the lateral tunnel, total cavopulmonary connection, and extracardiac conduit completion Fontan operations were constructed, and power losses, total flow distribution, vena caval and pulmonary arterial pressures, and flow distribution of inferior vena caval return were calculated.
RESULTS: The hemi-Fontan and bidirectional Glenn procedures performed nearly identically, with similar power losses and nearly equal flow distributions to each lung at all levels of pulmonary arteriolar resistance. However, the lateral tunnel Fontan procedure as performed after the hemi-Fontan operation had lower power losses (6.9 mW, pulmonary arteriolar resistance 3 units) than the total cavopulmonary connection (40.5 mW) or the extracardiac conduit (42.9 mW), although the inclusion of an enlargement patch toward the right in the total cavopulmonary connection was effective in reducing the difference (10.0 mW). Inferior vena caval flow to the right lung was 52% for the lateral tunnel, compared with 19%, 30%, 19%, and 15% for the total cavopulmonary connection, total cavopulmonary connection with right-sided enlargement patch, extracardiac conduit, and extracardiac conduit with a bevel to the left lung, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: According to these methods, the hemi-Fontan and bidirectional Glenn procedures performed equally well, but important differences in energy losses and flow distribution were found after the completion Fontan procedures. The superior hydraulic performance of the lateral tunnel Fontan operation after the hemi-Fontan procedure relative to any other method may be due to closer to optimal caval offset achieved in the surgical reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566244     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00698-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  29 in total

1.  The lateral tunnel Fontan procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: results of 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J C Hirsch; R G Ohye; E J Devaney; C S Goldberg; E L Bove
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Toward optimal hemodynamics: computer modeling of the Fontan circuit.

Authors:  E L Bove; M R de Leval; F Migliavacca; R Balossino; G Dubini
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Heart Failure in Adults who had the Fontan Procedure: Natural History, Evaluation, and Management.

Authors:  Ari Cedars; Susan Joseph; Philip Ludbrook
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-10

4.  Maladaptive aortic properties after the Norwood procedure: An angiographic analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial.

Authors:  Sarah T Plummer; Christoph P Hornik; Hamilton Baker; Gregory A Fleming; Susan Foerster; M Eric Ferguson; Andrew C Glatz; Russel Hirsch; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Kyong-Jin Lee; Alan B Lewis; Jennifer S Li; Mary Martin; Diego Porras; Wolfgang A K Radtke; John F Rhodes; Julie A Vincent; Jeffrey D Zampi; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Lateral Atrial Tunnel Fontan Operation Predisposes to the Junctional Rhythm.

Authors:  Katarzyna Januszewska; Anna Schuh; Anja Lehner; Robert Dalla-Pozza; Edward Malec
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan procedure.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Katogi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-18

Review 7.  Cavopulmonary assist: (em)powering the univentricular fontan circulation.

Authors:  Mark D Rodefeld; Steven H Frankel; Guruprasad A Giridharan
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu       Date:  2011

Review 8.  Computational Fluid Dynamics of Vascular Disease in Animal Models.

Authors:  Andrea Acuna; Alycia G Berman; Frederick W Damen; Brett A Meyers; Amelia R Adelsperger; Kelsey C Bayer; Melissa C Brindise; Brittani Bungart; Alexander M Kiel; Rachel A Morrison; Joseph C Muskat; Kelsey M Wasilczuk; Yi Wen; Jiacheng Zhang; Patrick Zito; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Hemodynamic performance of stage-2 univentricular reconstruction: Glenn vs. hemi-Fontan templates.

Authors:  Kerem Pekkan; Lakshimi P Dasi; Diane de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Mark A Fogel; Kirk R Kanter; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Recent advances in the application of computational mechanics to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Juan C Del Alamo; Alison L Marsden; Juan C Lasheras
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.