Literature DB >> 14561280

Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on 'honest' female ornamentation.

Natasha R LeBas1, Leon R Hockham, Michael G Ritchie.   

Abstract

Female ornamentation has long been overlooked because of the greater prevalence of elaborate displays in males. However, the circumstances under which females would benefit from honestly signalling their quality are limited. Females are not expected to invest in ornamentation unless the fitness benefits of the ornament exceed those derived from investing the resources directly into offspring. It has been proposed that when females gain direct benefits from mating, females may instead be selected for ornamentation that deceives males about their reproductive state. In the empidid dance flies, males frequently provide nuptial gifts and it is usually only the female that is ornamented. Female traits in empidids, such as abdominal sacs and enlarged pinnate leg scales, have been proposed to 'deceive' males into matings by disguising egg maturity. We quantified sexual selection in the dance fly Rhamphomyia tarsata and found escalating, quadratic selection on pinnate scales and that pinnate scales honestly reflect female fecundity. Mated females had a larger total number and more mature eggs than unmated females, highlighting a potential benefit rather than a cost of male mate choice. We also show correlational selection on female pinnate scales and fecundity. Correlational selection, equivalent investment patterns or increased nutrition from nuptial gifts may all maintain honesty in female ornamentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561280      PMCID: PMC1691484          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  Why are female birds ornamented?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Female barn owls (Tyto alba) advertise good genes.

Authors:  A Roulin; T W Jungi; H Pfister; C Dijkstra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures.

Authors:  D J Emlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

6.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Evolutionary biology: significance of primate sexual swellings.

Authors:  Dietmar Zinner; Susan C Alberts; Charles L Nunn; Jeanne Altmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phenotypic plasticity and the evolution of trade-offs: the quantitative genetics of resource allocation in the wing dimorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus.

Authors:  D A Roff; M B Gélinas
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Courtship role reversal and deceptive signals in the long-tailed dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  21 in total

1.  Costs of breeding and their effects on the direction of sexual selection.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.

Authors:  Rosalind L Murray; Jill Wheeler; Darryl T Gwynne; Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Adv Study Behav       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.818

Review 6.  Sexual conflict and sperm competition.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Paula Stockley; David J Hosken
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Phenotypic plasticity in the developmental integration of morphological trade-offs and secondary sexual trait compensation.

Authors:  Joseph L Tomkins; Janne S Kotiaho; Natasha R Lebas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Reappraising sexual coevolution and the sex roles.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  A female signal reflects MHC genotype in a social primate.

Authors:  Elise Huchard; Michel Raymond; Julio Benavides; Harry Marshall; Leslie A Knapp; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Experimental analysis of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection.

Authors:  H Carl Gerhardt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.