Literature DB >> 14560407

Revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented components and uncemented intramedullary stems.

Brian D Shannon1, Jeffrey F Klassen, James A Rand, Daniel J Berry, Robert T Trousdale.   

Abstract

Sixty-three failed total knee arthroplasties in 60 patients (27 females, 33 males; average age, 66 years) were treated consecutively with revision using cemented component fixation and an uncemented stem. Patients were followed for a mean of 5.75 years (range, 2-10 years); none were lost to follow-up. There were 12 (19%) re-revisions: 6 (10%) were revised for aseptic loosening, 4 (6%) for recurrent infection, and 2 (3%) for instability. Knee Society Pain Scores improved from 56 to 81, and function scores improved from 49 to 62 points. Latest radiographs in retained knees showed none with definite femoral loosening but 4 with tibial component loosening. Combining those revised for aseptic loosening and radiographic aseptic loosening, mechanical failure occurred in 10 patients (16%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560407     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00301-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Extent of vertical cementing as a predictive factor for radiolucency in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Sahnghoon Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Seong Hwan Kim; Young Min Lee; Joon Kyu Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Results of press-fit stems in revision knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Gavin C Wood; Douglas D R Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Morbid Obesity: Increased Risk of Failure After Aseptic Revision TKA.

Authors:  Chad D Watts; Eric R Wagner; Matthew T Houdek; David G Lewallen; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Reinfected revised TKA resolves with an aggressive protocol and antibiotic infusion.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside; Tariq A Nayfeh; Renee LaZear; Marcel E Roy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison between uncemented and cemented fixation for the tibial component in distal femoral replacement: a clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Haijie Liang; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang; Taiqiang Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in TKA treated with revision and direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside; Michael Peppers; Tariq A Nayfeh; Marcel E Roy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Preclinical evaluation of a novel implant for treatment of a full-thickness distal femoral focal cartilage defect.

Authors:  Erik I Waldorff; Blake J Roessler; Terri A Zachos; Bruce S Miller; Jonathan McHugh; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.