BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple benefits of postoperative perineural local anesthetic infusion have been shown including potent analgesia, decreased opioid requirements, and improved rehabilitation. Consequently, portable infusion pumps have been used with increasing frequency to provide perineural infusion for medically unsupervised ambulatory patients. We believe that the infusion rate accuracy and reliability of these pumps infusing potentially toxic doses of medication should be investigated independently. Therefore, we studied the flow-rate accuracy and consistency of various portable infusion pumps that have not been examined previously. METHODS: Using a computer/mass balance combination to record infusion rates, 6 pumps (3 electronic and 3 non electronic) were tested. Several factors that may influence pump performance were varied: temperature (ambient/skin), battery (replacement/addition), and catheter exchange (wound/perineural). RESULTS: Infusion rate accuracy differed significantly among the pumps, exhibiting flow rates within +/-15% of their expected rate for 55% to 99% of their infusion duration. Furthermore, the profiles (infusion rate over time) of the various pumps differed significantly depending on the pump power source. Although elastomeric pump infusion rate increased with an increase in temperature, battery life was a limiting factor for one of the electronic pumps. Substituting wound catheters with commonly used perineural catheters did not significantly alter infusion profile. CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as infusion rate accuracy and consistency, infusion profile, temperature sensitivity, and battery life affect the dose of medication administered by various portable pumps used for continuous regional analgesia. Health care providers should take these factors into consideration when choosing and using a portable infusion pump for local anesthetic administration.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple benefits of postoperative perineural local anesthetic infusion have been shown including potent analgesia, decreased opioid requirements, and improved rehabilitation. Consequently, portable infusion pumps have been used with increasing frequency to provide perineural infusion for medically unsupervised ambulatory patients. We believe that the infusion rate accuracy and reliability of these pumps infusing potentially toxic doses of medication should be investigated independently. Therefore, we studied the flow-rate accuracy and consistency of various portable infusion pumps that have not been examined previously. METHODS: Using a computer/mass balance combination to record infusion rates, 6 pumps (3 electronic and 3 non electronic) were tested. Several factors that may influence pump performance were varied: temperature (ambient/skin), battery (replacement/addition), and catheter exchange (wound/perineural). RESULTS: Infusion rate accuracy differed significantly among the pumps, exhibiting flow rates within +/-15% of their expected rate for 55% to 99% of their infusion duration. Furthermore, the profiles (infusion rate over time) of the various pumps differed significantly depending on the pump power source. Although elastomeric pump infusion rate increased with an increase in temperature, battery life was a limiting factor for one of the electronic pumps. Substituting wound catheters with commonly used perineural catheters did not significantly alter infusion profile. CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as infusion rate accuracy and consistency, infusion profile, temperature sensitivity, and battery life affect the dose of medication administered by various portable pumps used for continuous regional analgesia. Health care providers should take these factors into consideration when choosing and using a portable infusion pump for local anesthetic administration.
Authors: Lourdes Ferreira Laso; Amanda López Picado; Fernando Antoñanzas Villar; Laura Lamata de la Orden; Mar Ceballos Garcia; Carolina Ibañez López; Lorena Pipaon Ruilope; Felix Lamata Hernandez; Cesar Valero Martinez; Felipe Aizpuru; Roberto Hernandez Chaves Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Linda T Le; Vanessa J Loland; Edward R Mariano; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Brian M Ilfeld Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Michael C Edwards; Evan Sorokin; Mark Brzezienski; Farzad R Nahai; Richard Scranton; Holly Wall; Simeon Wall; Stephan Finical; Kevin Smith Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2015 Impact factor: 0.947
Authors: S J Madison; A M Monahan; R R Agarwal; T J Furnish; E J Mascha; Z Xu; M C Donohue; A C Morgan; B M Ilfeld Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 9.166