Literature DB >> 14550316

Commensal eating patterns: a community study.

Jeffery Sobal1, Mary K Nelson.   

Abstract

Commensality is eating with other people, and commensal eating patterns reflect the social relationships of individuals. This study examined usual meal partners in commensal units and frequency of eating with others in commensal circles among 663 adults responding to a mailed questionnaire in one community. Meal partner data revealed that most respondents ate alone at breakfast, alone or with co-workers at lunch, and with family members at dinner. Commensal frequency data revealed some eating at the homes of other family members, little eating at friends' homes, and almost no eating at neighbors' homes. Few demographic variations existed in commensal eating, except that unmarried individuals more often ate breakfast and dinner alone and more often ate with friends. These finding suggest that contemporary work-oriented society may lead people to eat alone during the day but share evening meals with family, and that people maintain commensal relationships primarily with family members rather than friends or neighbors. Peoples' social worlds appear to be focused on the nuclear family, and family members are also the people they usually eat with.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14550316     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  33 in total

1.  Support and Sabotage: A Qualitative Study of Social Influences on Health Behaviors Among Rural Adults.

Authors:  Urshila Sriram; Emily H Morgan; Meredith L Graham; Sara C Folta; Rebecca A Seguin
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Comiendo Bien: The Production of Latinidad through the Performance of Healthy Eating among Latino Immigrant Families in San Francisco.

Authors:  Airín D Martínez
Journal:  Symb Interact       Date:  2016-01-20

3.  Associations between company at dinner and daily diet quality in Dutch men and women from the NQplus study.

Authors:  L van Lee; A Geelen; E J C Hooft van Huysduynen; J H M de Vries; P van 't Veer; E J M Feskens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings.

Authors:  Mark A Pachucki; Paul F Jacques; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Eating with others and meal location are differentially associated with nutrient intake by sex: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE).

Authors:  Mark C Pachucki; Andrew J Karter; Nancy E Adler; Howard H Moffet; E Margaret Warton; Dean Schillinger; Bethany Hendrickson O'Connell; Barbara Laraia
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  "Eating Together" Is Associated with Food Behaviors and Demographic Factors of Older Japanese People Who Live Alone.

Authors:  M Ishikawa; Y Takemi; T Yokoyama; K Kusama; Y Fukuda; T Nakaya; M Nozue; N Yoshiike; K Yoshiba; F Hayashi; N Murayama
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Social Relationships and Health Behavior Across Life Course.

Authors:  Debra Umberson; Robert Crosnoe; Corinne Reczek
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2010-08-01

8.  College Students' Perceived Differences Between the Terms Real Meal, Meal, and Snack.

Authors:  Jinan Banna; Rickelle Richards; Lora Beth Brown
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.045

9.  Behavioral contexts, food-choice coping strategies, and dietary quality of a multiethnic sample of employed parents.

Authors:  Christine E Blake; Elaine Wethington; Tracy J Farrell; Carole A Bisogni; Carol M Devine
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-03

10.  Marital status, marital transitions, and body weight.

Authors:  Debra Umberson; Hui Liu; Daniel Powers
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.