Literature DB >> 11352210

Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication.

J M Plumert1, T L Spalding, P Nichols-Whitehead.   

Abstract

People prefer to order spatial information in a hierarchy of decreasing size of spatial unit when giving directions for finding objects and in a hierarchy of increasing size of spatial unit when providing descriptions of object locations (Plumert, Carswell, DeVet, & Ihrig, 1995). In five experiments, we examined whether people have a preference for ascending or descending organization when the task does not involve conveying spatial information to others. In Experiments 1-3, people learned the locations of objects in a model house and then verified statements describing those locations. People verified statements faster when spatial units were organized in an ascending (i.e., small to large) than in a descending (i.e., large to small) or random order. In Experiment 4, people first performed a sentence verification task and afterward wrote down directions for finding the objects. People again exhibited a preference for ascending organization in the verification task but exhibited a preference for descending organization when giving directions for finding the same objects. Experiment 5 demonstrated that the ascending advantage was not due to the link between the object and small landmark. Discussion focuses on the role of pragmatics and memory retrieval in preferences for ascending versus descending hierarchical organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352210     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  Descriptions and depictions of environments.

Authors:  H A Taylor; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.

Authors:  M F Schober
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-04

4.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05

6.  Reference points in spatial cognition.

Authors:  E K Sadalla; W J Burroughs; L J Staplin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-09

7.  Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.

Authors:  T P McNamara; V A Diwadkar
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.