Literature DB >> 12215549

Combined functional and structural evaluation of cancer patients with a hybrid camera-based PET/CT system using (18)F-FDG.

Ora Israel1, Maya Mor, Diana Gaitini, Zohar Keidar, Luda Guralnik, Ahuva Engel, Alex Frenkel, Rachel Bar-Shalom, Abraham Kuten.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Correct diagnosis and definition of the functional and anatomic status of lesions in cancer patients are of clinical importance. The value of hybrid imaging using a gamma camera-based PET/CT and (18)F-FDG in determining the relationship between mass and cancer was assessed.
METHODS: Hybrid imaging was performed using a device combining low-dose CT and gamma camera-based PET. Ninety-one patients with histologically proven malignancy and 190 suspected sites of disease were evaluated. Camera-based PET was performed after the injection of 296-370 MBq (18)F-FDG. The presence of organomegaly or an abnormal mass on CT and of abnormal uptake of (18)F-FDG was assessed for each suspected lesion. The presence of malignancy at each site was determined by biopsy, imaging follow-up, or clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Five imaging patterns were found. Pattern 1 showed congruent abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake and a mass on CT in 110 of the lesions. One hundred two sites (93%) had active cancer. Pattern 2 showed a mass on CT, larger than the area of abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake, and was found in 5 lesions. Active malignancy was proven in 3 sites (60%). Pattern 3 showed an abnormal mass on CT with no (18)F-FDG uptake and was found in 52 lesions. Thirteen of these lesions (25%) had active tumor. Pattern 4 showing abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake with no mass on CT was found in 23 lesions. Sixteen of these sites (70%) were malignant. Pattern 5 showed normal CT findings and no abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake in 11 patients. Two of these patients (18%) had active disease. Hybrid imaging was of value in establishing the correct relationship between CT and (18)F-FDG findings in 98 of the 190 lesions (52%).
CONCLUSION: A range of patterns presenting with or without abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake on camera-based PET and a mass on CT may occur in suspected cancer sites. Both structural changes on CT and increased cell metabolism expressed by abnormal (18)F-FDG uptake should be considered in oncologic imaging. Hybrid imaging, a combined physiologic and anatomic modality, appears to provide new diagnostic opportunities in characterizing function and morphology in malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  12 in total

1.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Ha; Yun Young Choi; Soon Young Song; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-08-03

Review 2.  Surgical management of colorectal liver metastases: a European perspective.

Authors:  Declan Fj Dunne; Robert P Jones; Hassan Z Malik; Stephen W Fenwick; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

3.  The incremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric malignancies.

Authors:  Zvi Bar-Sever; Zohar Keidar; Ayelet Ben-Barak; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Sergey Postovsky; Luda Guralnik; Myriam W Ben Arush; Ora Israel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET/CT in primary musculoskeletal tumours: a step forward.

Authors:  A Lakkaraju; C N Patel; K M Bradley; A F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Colorectal liver metastases; the current scenario.

Authors:  Samir Pathak; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-19

6.  Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?

Authors:  Pierre Vera; Matthieu John Ouvrier; Sébastien Hapdey; Marc Thillays; Anne Sophie Pesquet; Brigitte Diologent; Françoise Callonec; Anne Hitzel; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Jean François Ménard; Fabrice Jardin; Hervé Tilly
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner.

Authors:  Tung-Hsin Wu; Yung-Hui Huang; Jason J S Lee; Shih-Yuan Wang; Su-Cheng Wang; Cheng-Tau Su; Liang-Kung Chen; Tieh-Chi Chu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Image fusion using CT, MRI and PET for treatment planning, navigation and follow up in percutaneous RFA.

Authors:  F L Giesel; A Mehndiratta; J Locklin; M J McAuliffe; S White; P L Choyke; M V Knopp; B J Wood; U Haberkorn; H von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Exp Oncol       Date:  2009-06

Review 9.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Defining the Modalities of Intravenous Contrast Application During the Diagnostics of Hepatic Metastases with Computerized Tomography.

Authors:  Arben Kutllovci; Halit Ymeri; Drita Zogaj; Skender Kutllovci; Dukagjin Zogaj
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.