Literature DB >> 14530729

Left ventricular assist devices as permanent heart failure therapy: the price of progress.

Mehmet C Oz1, Annetine C Gelijns, Leslie Miller, Cuiling Wang, Patrice Nickens, Raymond Arons, Keith Aaronson, Wayne Richenbacher, Clifford van Meter, Karl Nelson, Alan Weinberg, John Watson, Eric A Rose, Alan J Moskowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND DATA: The REMATCH trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in stage D chronic end-stage heart failure patients. Compared with optimal medical management, LVAD implantation significantly improved the survival and quality of life of these terminally ill patients. To date, however, there have been no analyses of the cost related to the LVAD survival benefit. This paper addresses the cost of hospital resource use, and its predictors, for long-term LVAD patients.
METHODS: Detailed cost data were available for 52 of 68 REMATCH patients randomized to LVAD therapy. We combined the clinical dataset with Medicare data, standard billing forms (UB-92), and line item bills provided directly by clinical centers. Charges were converted to costs by using the Ratio-of-Cost-to-Charges for each major resource category.
RESULTS: The mean cost for the initial implant-related hospitalization was $210,187 +/- 193,295. When implantation hospitalization costs are compared between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, the mean costs increase from $159,271 +/- 106,423 to $315,015 +/- 278,713. Sepsis, pump housing infection, and perioperative bleeding are the major drivers of implantation cost, established by regression modeling. In the patients who survived the procedure (n = 35), bypass time, perioperative bleeding, and late bleeding were the drivers of cost. The average annual readmission cost per patient for the overall cohort was $105,326.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost of long-term LVAD implantation is commensurate with other life-saving organ transplantation procedures like liver transplantation. As an evolving technology, there are a number of opportunities for improvement that will likely reduce costs in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14530729      PMCID: PMC1360116          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  E A Rose; A C Gelijns; A J Moskowitz; D F Heitjan; L W Stevenson; W Dembitsky; J W Long; D D Ascheim; A R Tierney; R G Levitan; J T Watson; P Meier; N S Ronan; P A Shapiro; R M Lazar; L W Miller; L Gupta; O H Frazier; P Desvigne-Nickens; M C Oz; V L Poirier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Mechanical cardiac-support devices--dreams and devilish details.

Authors:  M Jessup
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Capturing the unexpected benefits of medical research.

Authors:  A C Gelijns; N Rosenberg; A J Moskowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-09-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: effect of patient selection on outcome.

Authors:  M C Deng; M Loebe; A El-Banayosy; E Gronda; P G Jansen; M Vigano; G M Wieselthaler; B Reichart; E Vitali; A Pavie; T Mesana; D Y Loisance; D R Wheeldon; P M Portner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach.

Authors:  J B O'Connell; M R Bristow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Evolving costs of long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  A C Gelijns; A F Richards; D L Williams; M C Oz; J Oliveira; A J Moskowitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST).

Authors:  R M Califf; K F Adams; W J McKenna; M Gheorghiade; B F Uretsky; S E McNulty; H Darius; K Schulman; F Zannad; E Handberg-Thurmond; F E Harrell; W Wheeler; J Soler-Soler; K Swedberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Selective anticoagulation with active site blocked factor IXa in synthetic patch vascular repair results in decreased blood loss and operative time.

Authors:  T B Spanier; M C Oz; J D Madigan; E A Rose; D M Stern; R Nowygrod; A M Schmidt
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: improving outcomes.

Authors:  Harry R Büller
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.180

10.  Screening scale predicts patients successfully receiving long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  M C Oz; D J Goldstein; P Pepino; A D Weinberg; S M Thompson; K A Catanese; R L Vargo; P M McCarthy; E A Rose; H R Levin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  21 in total

1.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy for End-stage Heart Failure.

Authors:  Lynne Warner Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-12

2.  Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Lindsay E Adkins; Andrew B Civitello; Pranav Loyalka; Nanthini Palanichamy; Courtney J Gemmato; Timothy J Myers; Igor D Gregoric; Reynolds M Delgado
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

3.  Cardiac assist device infections.

Authors:  Shmuel Shoham; Leslie W Miller
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Readmission due to driveline infection can be predicted by new score by using serum albumin and body mass index during long-term left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Daisuke Nitta; Toshiro Inaba; Hisataka Maki; Masaru Hatano; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Mechanical circulatory support devices as destination therapy-current evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Puehler; Stephan Ensminger; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Börgermann; Erik Rehn; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Michiel Morshuis; Jan Gummert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  The financial burden of destination left ventricular assist device therapy: who and when?

Authors:  Mark C Bieniarz; Reynolds Delgado
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Orthotopic heart transplant versus left ventricular assist device: a national comparison of cost and survival.

Authors:  Daniel P Mulloy; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Matthew L Stone; Gorav Ailawadi; Irving L Kron; John A Kern
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Quality of life and functional status in patients surviving 12 months after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Jeremiah G Allen; Eric S Weiss; Justin M Schaffer; Nishant D Patel; Susan L Ullrich; Stuart D Russell; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2004-03-01

10.  Assessing technological change in cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Mark J Russo; Alan J Moskowitz; Deborah D Ascheim; Lawrence D Brown; Annetine C Gelijns
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.